Prev: SDIO devices using SDIO bus Driver on Windows Mobile 6.1
Next: alternate of FSCTL_GET_RETRIEVAL_POINTER_BASE for windows xp
From: Alexander Grigoriev on 12 Oct 2009 10:21 Why do you want a particular order? What problem you're trying to solve by that? "Cameroon" <Cameroon(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4800C8CC-80A9-4A95-ADE6-B0A770A9AAEB(a)microsoft.com... > Hi, > > Do you know the order that Windows server 2003 employs? Or is there any > entry in the registry that controls the PCI device powerdown order, since > I'm > seeing different behaviour from one machine to another, with exactly same > OS > and adapters. > > Regards > > "Maxim S. Shatskih" wrote: >
From: Cameroon on 12 Oct 2009 11:11 I'm working on a system which relies on the powerdown dependency of PCI devices. "Alexander Grigoriev" wrote: > Why do you want a particular order? What problem you're trying to solve by > that? > > "Cameroon" <Cameroon(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:4800C8CC-80A9-4A95-ADE6-B0A770A9AAEB(a)microsoft.com... > > Hi, > > > > Do you know the order that Windows server 2003 employs? Or is there any > > entry in the registry that controls the PCI device powerdown order, since > > I'm > > seeing different behaviour from one machine to another, with exactly same > > OS > > and adapters. > > > > Regards > > > > "Maxim S. Shatskih" wrote: > > > > >
From: Maxim S. Shatskih on 12 Oct 2009 14:25 > Do you know the order that Windows server 2003 employs? Or is there any > entry in the registry that controls the PCI device powerdown order, since I'm > seeing different behaviour from one machine to another, with exactly same OS > and adapters. No guarantees at all, except: a) PnP children are put to sleep before their parent and are awaken after their parent c) PowerRelations (not documented at all, used from Win7 I think) -- Maxim S. Shatskih Windows DDK MVP maxim(a)storagecraft.com http://www.storagecraft.com
From: Maxim S. Shatskih on 12 Oct 2009 14:26 > I'm working on a system which relies on the powerdown dependency of PCI > devices. Probably impossible with Windows. Let's wait what MS's people will say. -- Maxim S. Shatskih Windows DDK MVP maxim(a)storagecraft.com http://www.storagecraft.com
From: Alexander Grigoriev on 13 Oct 2009 01:06
You have to design your own inter-driver interface, and enforce device power-down order through that private interface. "Cameroon" <Cameroon(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:F83E2A1F-A39E-4AB1-B1CC-78202851AB6D(a)microsoft.com... > I'm working on a system which relies on the powerdown dependency of PCI > devices. > > "Alexander Grigoriev" wrote: > >> Why do you want a particular order? What problem you're trying to solve >> by >> that? >> >> "Cameroon" <Cameroon(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:4800C8CC-80A9-4A95-ADE6-B0A770A9AAEB(a)microsoft.com... >> > Hi, >> > >> > Do you know the order that Windows server 2003 employs? Or is there any >> > entry in the registry that controls the PCI device powerdown order, >> > since >> > I'm >> > seeing different behaviour from one machine to another, with exactly >> > same >> > OS >> > and adapters. >> > >> > Regards >> > >> > "Maxim S. Shatskih" wrote: >> > >> >> >> |