From: LD55ZRA on 17 Apr 2010 22:37 Andy Siegel wrote: >Does anyone know if there are plans for XP SP4? I just installed XP SP3 and >ran the Windows Updates and needed 72 updates (on the first pass). I know we >should go to Win7, but we have a lot of XP out there. > >Thank you, > > Unlikely but I don't think you are going to miss it because Microsoft patches are patches for the sake of creating jobs for programmers who wouldn't have anything else to do. The only patch you should look out for is in April 1914 when Microsoft would be required to issue a non-activation tool for Windows XP. If they don't, then look out for a class action by users of Windows XP. hth -- THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright LD55ZRA 2010.
From: LD55ZRA on 17 Apr 2010 22:47 LD55ZRA wrote: > Andy Siegel wrote: > >> Does anyone know if there are plans for XP SP4? I just installed XP >> SP3 and ran the Windows Updates and needed 72 updates (on the first >> pass). I know we should go to Win7, but we have a lot of XP out there. >> >> Thank you, >> >> > > Unlikely but I don't think you are going to miss it because Microsoft > patches are patches for the sake of creating jobs for programmers who > wouldn't have anything else to do. The only patch you should look out > for is in April 1914 when Microsoft would be required to issue a > non-activation tool for Windows XP. If they don't, then look out > for a class action by users of Windows XP. > > hth > > The above date should be read as 14 April 2014. Also, there is absolutely no point in installing any updates post SP3 because there is no evidence they make your system any better or increase the level of security. I have not installed any and I have completely blocked all Windows and Office Updates reaching none of the systems under my control. hth -- THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright LD55ZRA 2010.
From: Unknown on 18 Apr 2010 18:16 Still playing stupid I see. Well, you're winning. "LD55ZRA" <LD55ZRA(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:hqdr9n$ajk$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > Andy Siegel wrote: > >>Does anyone know if there are plans for XP SP4? I just installed XP SP3 >>and ran the Windows Updates and needed 72 updates (on the first pass). I >>know we should go to Win7, but we have a lot of XP out there. >> >>Thank you, >> > > Unlikely but I don't think you are going to miss it because Microsoft > patches are patches for the sake of creating jobs for programmers who > wouldn't have anything else to do. The only patch you should look out for > is in April 1914 when Microsoft would be required to issue a > non-activation tool for Windows XP. If they don't, then look out for a > class action by users of Windows XP. > > hth > > > -- > THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY > KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR > IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND > FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA > OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER > INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF > BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS > ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH > DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR > LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL > DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. > > Copyright LD55ZRA 2010. >
From: Unknown on 18 Apr 2010 18:27 How can you state the following? Wouldn't it be beneficial to release a service pack to tie up all the loose ends? .. All you get now are functional updates that are either considered part of security updates or can be applied to code branches for their newer and supported versions; however, those won't get rolled into a service pack.
From: VanguardLH on 19 Apr 2010 02:58 Unknown wrote: > How can you state the following? Wouldn't it be beneficial to release a > service pack > to tie up all the loose ends? > > . All you get now are > functional updates that are either considered part of security updates or > can be applied to code branches for their newer and supported versions; > however, those won't get rolled into a service pack. When you own 51% of Microsoft's stock then you can tell them what YOU would like them to do.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Jabra GN 5035 (Unknown device) Next: restore SD card capacity |