Prev: JB = Hip!
Next: Music choices was Re: JB -> Hammerhead
From: Cross-Slide on 21 Apr 2010 14:06 On Apr 21, 12:34 pm, "Existential Angst" <UNfit...(a)UNoptonline.net> wrote: > "Black Dragon" <b...(a)nomail.invalid> wrote in message > > news:hqnbm1$2aic$1(a)bdhi.local... > > > Existential Angst wrote: > > >> This is all, of course, waaaay of jb's head, but then so are spreadsheets > >> and manual contouring, and, or course, mastercam. > > > You gotta' admire Jon's thorough ownership of a small group of people. > > > The man is indeed a True Master of his Craft. :) > > Partial truth there -- We all DO seem willing to dance, on command!! > > But, the other truth remains, that jb fancies himself a puppeteer, and that > in itself is deranged. > He puppeteers because he can't really contribute. > > That we respond to tugs on our strings is another issue. > Mebbe a bunch of us miss JHS as well, eh?? > -- > EA > > > > > -- > > Black Dragon > > > I'd love to kiss you, but I just washed my hair. > > -- Bette Davis, "Cabin in the Cotton" The real truth is more accurately described as a wino constantly wanders into a restaurant and pisses into the salad bar. After a while the patrons will rise up and try to drive the idiot out of the restaurant. BD totally worships the sick, disgusting wino.
From: John R. Carroll on 21 Apr 2010 14:08 Black Dragon wrote: > John R. Carroll wrote: > >> Black Dragon wrote: >>> Existential Angst wrote: > >>>> This is all, of course, waaaay of jb's head, but then so are >>>> spreadsheets and manual contouring, and, or course, mastercam. > >>> You gotta' admire Jon's thorough ownership of a small group of >>> people. > >>> The man is indeed a True Master of his Craft. :) > >> Whatever. > > It's true. Joe788 and James Meyette were admiring Jon's madd skills on > the eMastercam forum recently, and Jon hasn't (that I'm aware of > anyway) been around there for several months now. > >> Let me know how the low temp. stuff works out. > > I passed the information uphill and it's mostly out of my hands now. > Our metrology guy has some wax like substance he says will do the job. > I seriously doubt it'll do it accurately and have made my opinion > known. LOL It's likely that they didn't want to spend the $100.00 per pound this sort of material costs. -- John R. Carroll
From: Joe788 on 21 Apr 2010 14:52 On Apr 21, 10:53 am, Black Dragon <b...(a)nomail.invalid> wrote: > John R. Carroll wrote: > > Black Dragon wrote: > >> Existential Angst wrote: > >>> This is all, of course, waaaay of jb's head, but then so are > >>> spreadsheets and manual contouring, and, or course, mastercam. > >> You gotta' admire Jon's thorough ownership of a small group of people. > >> The man is indeed a True Master of his Craft. :) > > Whatever. > > It's true. Joe788 and James Meyette were admiring Jon's madd skills on > the eMastercam forum recently, and Jon hasn't (that I'm aware of anyway) > been around there for several months now. > Jon was just outed and banned again two or three weeks ago, and he's certainly still there lurking in the darkness like Gollum. Meanwhile, he's still desperately pretending to be me. Which certainly display 100% ownership if there ever was such a thing. He also started calling people's service providers threatening lawsuits. Again, full, 100% ownership to the level that Jon decided to take it to real life.
From: Stormin Mormon on 21 Apr 2010 18:35 Rapid hardening, and waterproof result. -- Christopher A. Young Learn more about Jesus www.lds.org ..
From: John R. Carroll on 21 Apr 2010 18:59
Black Dragon wrote: > John R. Carroll wrote: > >> Black Dragon wrote: >>> John R. Carroll wrote: > >>>> Black Dragon wrote: >>>>> Existential Angst wrote: > >>>>>> This is all, of course, waaaay of jb's head, but then so are >>>>>> spreadsheets and manual contouring, and, or course, mastercam. > >>>>> You gotta' admire Jon's thorough ownership of a small group of >>>>> people. > >>>>> The man is indeed a True Master of his Craft. :) > >>>> Whatever. > >>> It's true. Joe788 and James Meyette were admiring Jon's madd skills >>> on the eMastercam forum recently, and Jon hasn't (that I'm aware of >>> anyway) been around there for several months now. > >>>> Let me know how the low temp. stuff works out. > >>> I passed the information uphill and it's mostly out of my hands now. >>> Our metrology guy has some wax like substance he says will do the >>> job. I seriously doubt it'll do it accurately and have made my >>> opinion known. > >> LOL >> It's likely that they didn't want to spend the $100.00 per pound >> this sort of material costs. > > I've been to that rodeo more than once with those people. > > I'm not a business person so I'm quite ignorant in these matters. Can > someone explain to me how it's better to spend days doing something > that can be done in hours if a few hundred bucks were spent up front > on the proper materials to do the job? LOL I've been down the wax road, for a minute. I found that it didn't release distortion free enough to give me confidence and was flaky to measure. You only have to close in on screwing up a $2,500.00 core once to be business person enough. Especially if your customer is tapping his foot waiting for parts. -- John R. Carroll |