Worries About Stealing, etc
in [Windows Viruses]
|
From: David H. Lipman on 9 Apr 2010 17:49 From: "Andy Medina" <gmedina(a)email.arizona.edu> | "David Kaye" <sfdavidkaye2(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message | news:hpo3i7$vsn$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... | [stuff] | So now you are engaged in the same stuff you originally stated you | "have no time for". | Remember the "Tirades" thread: | From: "David Kaye" <sfdavidkaye2(a)yahoo.com> | Subject: The Tirades | Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010 12:23 PM | If you folks keep bitching and fighting instead of fighting malware | I'm going | to go away. I am trying to contribute useful information from my work | in the | field, but I'll be damned if I'm going to continue here if 3/4 of the | stuff is | people bitching at each other over perceived slights. I have no time | for it. +1 -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: David Kaye on 9 Apr 2010 19:45 "Andy Medina" <gmedina(a)email.arizona.edu> wrote: >So now you are engaged in the same stuff you originally stated you >"have no time for". For a few moments, then I drop it. Notice that I have made very few posts on this topic compared with the others.
From: "FromTheRafters" erratic on 9 Apr 2010 19:51 "The Real Truth MVP" <trt(a)void.com> wrote in message news:hpo91f$9c5$1(a)leythos.motzarella.org... > First let me say again that nothing of mine is stolen. But you *do* make unauthorized use of the work product of others. > That is why there is no law suit. That doesn't follow - there can be any number of reasons for not filing a lawsuit. > Second my software is nothing but standard DOS commands put into a > batch file. So if anyone is to sue me it would have to be Bill Gates. It's all destined to be ones and zeroes, and nobody owns those (so you're in the clear). :o\ (wanna buy a bridge?) [more lies removed]
From: Leythos on 10 Apr 2010 09:10 In article <hpo91f$9c5$1(a)leythos.motzarella.org>, trt(a)void.com says... > First let me say again that nothing of mine is stolen. > Notice the play on words? Nothing of HIS is stolen, but he fails to mention that content HE'S INCLUDED came from others and the embedded signatures that are fakes, put there by the real authors prove he's "Stolen" the code he claims as HIS. -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: Virus Guy on 10 Apr 2010 23:45
Someone answer me this: Is any of this contentious code or scripts or what-ever, is any of it being made available for a price? Is anyone charging money for it? Or is it given away for free as public service in the fight against malware? Leythos wrote: > When you have something that you value, that you've created, > stolen by another person and the credit changed to that person, > you won't feel the same way. That depends on two things: a) is the creation (code, etc) acting as a source of income by any of the so-called authors? b) do any of the so-called authors make their real identity fully and clearly visible to the end user of the creative work - regardless if this work is given away for free or is sold to the end user. Authorship and/or correct attribution of a creative work is important. But most of this thread that deals with the idea of people taking each other to court becomes fruitless if nobody is selling the work or gaining any revenue from it. And if the real identities of the people that claim to have created these works are not plainly visible to end users, then nobody can claim that their recognition is being stolen from them if they don't publically acknowledge their creative role. Full-Quoter The Real Truth MVP top-poasted: > All that BS Leythos has you believing is just that BS. Has Leythos admitted to being an author of any of this code yet? Do we know who he is? |