Prev: Adaptive Filtering v Lock In Amp
Next: Draft paper submission deadline is extended: IVPCV-10, Orlando, USA
From: Tim Wescott on 14 Feb 2010 23:48 On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:00:15 -0600, Vladimir Vassilevsky wrote: > Tim Wescott wrote: > >>>>I dimly recall that someone suggested a software PLL paper, >> I'll be doing a literature search at the local Uni library -- even if >> it's been published academically, there's always room for a new >> tutorial, as long as it has my name on it. > > It is no big deal to build an analog of continuous time PLL in the > software. However, one of the good things about software PLL is that you > can implement optimal control algorithm in the loop instead of classic > linear filter. Once I tried to do that; and it worked just wondeful; > since then I became the staunch supporter of the modern control theory. > It's certainly one place where the plant behavior stays predictable enough to have optimal control techniques do well. -- www.wescottdesign.com
From: Rob Gaddi on 15 Feb 2010 14:41 On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:29:06 -0800 (PST) Rune Allnor <allnor(a)tele.ntnu.no> wrote: > On 13 Feb, 01:50, Tim Wescott <t...(a)seemywebsite.com> wrote: > > > tim at wescottdesign dot com > > > > (if the spammers ever learn to read English we're doomed). > > n | One might attempt a rephrasing: > a | > m | name with someplace point domain. > e | > @ | Ought to be decodeable by humans. > s | > o | Another possibility is to write top - down > m | in the margin, as I attempted at the side here. > e | Just make sure to have phrased and spell-checked > l | the post first - if you need to edit any substantial > a | amount of editing after having included the margin > c | text, as I did with this post, there is a *lot* more work! > e | > . | Rune > d | > o | > m | Weak puns always help as well. -- Rob Gaddi, Highland Technology Email address is currently out of order
From: Tim Wescott on 15 Feb 2010 15:13 On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:29:06 -0800, Rune Allnor wrote: > On 13 Feb, 01:50, Tim Wescott <t...(a)seemywebsite.com> wrote: > >> tim at wescottdesign dot com >> >> (if the spammers ever learn to read English we're doomed). > > n | One might attempt a rephrasing: > a | > m | name with someplace point domain. e | > @ | Ought to be decodeable by humans. s | > o | Another possibility is to write top - down m | in the margin, as I > attempted at the side here. e | Just make sure to have phrased and > spell-checked l | the post first - if you need to edit any substantial a > | amount of editing after having included the margin c | text, as I did > with this post, there is a *lot* more work! e | > . | Rune > d | > o | > m | Unless it's confounded by the other guy's newsgroup reader (you _did_ put in line feeds on your side, yes?) -- www.wescottdesign.com
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Adaptive Filtering v Lock In Amp Next: Draft paper submission deadline is extended: IVPCV-10, Orlando, USA |