Prev: If Economics is one of the "Soft Sciences" how can it be trusted determine so much in society?
Next: Terminology question
From: Inverse 19 mathematics on 15 Jul 2010 10:30
We had posted a simple equation to stdy divergence and convergence by
using ^2 which your fermat never understood , neither do you ou your
fellow Fermatists , Your number theory is in error , a grave error.
Understand this you Fermatists, this is a simple no brainer but in the
numbers sysyem it proves that the numbers are set at 1:3, 1:6, not
1:4, Why , you Fermatists.

The base of convegergence is 3 by whole number

1^+2^2=5--------------------------1+2=3
2^2-1^2=3--------------------------2-1=1



This is good till infinity >+4 , and <-2 with each +1, as can be
expected with ^2-- BUT , BUT , BUT You fermatists the base of the
mathematics is 1:3, you cannot converge a (2^2-1) below 3, you
fermatists. That is may be one of the reason why one of your ace
mathematician Dr Edgar Escultura PHD , Madison, Wisconsin, atleast
understood tan 19 1:3, 1:6 and acknowledged it , and why we produced
over 2 billion consecutive prime numbers, and why all this will be in
a Mathematical bronze memorial , within a month with the name of one
your best mathematicics professors


YOUR NUMBERS THEORY HAS THE WRONG ROOT AND WRONG PREMISE, MATHEMATICS
IS DIVERGENT CONVERGENT AT 1:3

ALSO INCIDENTAL

X^2 +(X+1)^2 = always = Prime and pseudoprime, examples

8^2 + 9^2= 145------
10^2+11^2=221--------

11^2+12^2=225-----

12^2 +13^2=313---
13^2+14^2= 365---

Hope Research

Link

http://hoperesearch.web.officelive.com.aspx
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: If Economics is one of the "Soft Sciences" how can it be trusted determine so much in society?
Next: Terminology question