From: Chris on
I have two and 1/2 stereo adapters that take mic/line level inputs and
match impedance (not sure on this one) to a 8/32" stereo phono jack
for a video camera. We suspect that some of the x-formers are bad in
the unit. Would this most likely be Low to high Z x-former or just
1:1 isolation transformers. The 1/2 side that works shows almost a
short circuit on both sides of the x-former. However several of the
ones that don't work show 5~600Ohms pure DC resistance. The 500Ohms
sounds more normal for a small signal x-former than nearly zero. I
plan on tracing the circuit with a scope and an injected sine wave to
see where my signal disappears. However I am not able to find the x-
former on the net. It has BEI MA392 R.2 RoHS stamped on the side. No
other info.

Thanks,
Chris Maness
From: Gerard Bok on
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:26:18 -0700 (PDT), Chris
<christopher.maness(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>I have two and 1/2 stereo adapters that take mic/line level inputs and
>match impedance (not sure on this one) to a 8/32" stereo phono jack
>for a video camera. We suspect that some of the x-formers are bad in
>the unit.

One other possible source of confusion stems from the fact that
there is no standard XLR wiring schema.
So next to some units being faulty, you may be looking at wiring
discrepancies. There is balanced vs unbalanced.
And USA (2 cold, 3 hot) versus European (2 hot, 3 cold)

--
met vriendelijke groet,
Gerard Bok
From: Ron on
On 26/03/2010 10:35, Gerard Bok wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:26:18 -0700 (PDT), Chris
> <christopher.maness(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have two and 1/2 stereo adapters that take mic/line level inputs and
>> match impedance (not sure on this one) to a 8/32" stereo phono jack
>> for a video camera. We suspect that some of the x-formers are bad in
>> the unit.
>
> One other possible source of confusion stems from the fact that
> there is no standard XLR wiring schema.
> So next to some units being faulty, you may be looking at wiring
> discrepancies. There is balanced vs unbalanced.
> And USA (2 cold, 3 hot) versus European (2 hot, 3 cold)
>

The standard for XLR wiring is 1 ground, 2 hot, 3 cold. It wouldn't make
much difference if 2 and 3 were reversed as long as pin 1 was always ground

Ron(UK)
From: Dave Plowman (News) on
In article <XK-dnZnmXt9eEzHWnZ2dnUVZ8g-dnZ2d(a)bt.com>,
Ron <ron(a)lunevalleyaudio.com> wrote:
> The standard for XLR wiring is 1 ground, 2 hot, 3 cold. It wouldn't make
> much difference if 2 and 3 were reversed as long as pin 1 was always
> ground

It certainly would if using two mics close together...;-)

--
*Just give me chocolate and nobody gets hurt

Dave Plowman dave(a)davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
From: Ron on
On 26/03/2010 14:06, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
> In article<XK-dnZnmXt9eEzHWnZ2dnUVZ8g-dnZ2d(a)bt.com>,
> Ron<ron(a)lunevalleyaudio.com> wrote:
>> The standard for XLR wiring is 1 ground, 2 hot, 3 cold. It wouldn't make
>> much difference if 2 and 3 were reversed as long as pin 1 was always
>> ground
>
> It certainly would if using two mics close together...;-)
>

Well yeah, on the other hand, two mikes close together may require the
polarity of one to be reversed. But lets not complicate matters <grin>

Ron