Prev: VideoLAN Movie Creator
Next: DumpSec v2.8.6
From: Franklin on 24 Dec 2009 15:17
hummingbird wrote:

> You have a problem with your character set. lol.
> It makes your copy/paste look like an amateur's dog's breakfast.
>
> Why not ask a tetchy to sort it out for you?

You're like those newbies who post in html. You both think fancy lettering
looks whizzy.

Some English language newsreaders will display your special characters in
the headers as jumbled garbage.

Happy Xmas!
From: »Q« on 24 Dec 2009 16:35
In <news:Xns9CEBCE583EB6CMN55401(a)news-1.octanews.net>,
Franklin <i-am-franklin(a)usenet.com.invalid> wrote:

> hummingbird wrote:
>
> > You have a problem with your character set. lol.
> > It makes your copy/paste look like an amateur's dog's breakfast.
> >
> > Why not ask a tetchy to sort it out for you?
>
> You're like those newbies who post in html. You both think fancy
> lettering looks whizzy.
>
> Some English language newsreaders will display your special
> characters in the headers as jumbled garbage.

The 8-bit characters in his Organization header are properly encoded,
but hummingbird is intentionally violating RFCs with the other ones.
Remember you're dealing with a guy who accidentally put "X-No-Archive"
in his Keywords header for most of a year, not someone who understands
headers or charsets. Not surprising that he finds the results of his
own work to be "incomprehensible".

From: hummingbird on 27 Dec 2009 21:19

Oh look!
Here we have �Q� (who uses two 8bit chars in his posting name
which causes some news clients/browsers to freak out, and who
hosts unlawful PL.ISOs on his private server) - debating a
nonsense issue about alleged misuse of 8bit chars by me in my
Headers - with Franklin: the well known Internet Terrorist, mass
sockpuppeteer, FORGER, nym-switcher, criminal copywrite thief,
malicious uploader of malware to other peoples' servers,
psychopathic stalker and Usenet troll, who has TWICE claimed that
HE owns the posting name "hummingbird" and that *I* have stolen
it from him. MIDs are available to prove this if required.

You couldn't make this up, no really. It's Priceless!
Why don't we call it """Pricelessware"""?

This is a keeper :-)

It's sure nice to see they get along so well :-)

Let's see what they have to say to each other
..
..
la la la
_______________________________________________________

'�Q�' wrote thus:
>In <news:Xns9CEBCE583EB6CMN55401(a)news-1.octanews.net>,
>Franklin <i-am-franklin(a)usenet.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> hummingbird wrote:
>>
>> > You have a problem with your character set. lol.
>> > It makes your copy/paste look like an amateur's dog's breakfast.

Franklin wrote:
>> > Why not ask a tetchy to sort it out for you?

Note how Franklin has deliberately changed the spelling I
originally used from "techy" to 'tetchy'.

Why does he do that, anybody???

Franklin wrote:
>> You're like those newbies who post in html. You both think fancy
>> lettering looks whizzy.

Poor analogy. I have never posted in HTML.

Franklin wrote:
>> Some English language newsreaders will display your special
>> characters in the headers as jumbled garbage.

Too bad for them. You are mostly referring to old news clients and
some browsers and some terminals attached to uni servers etc etc.
I am not responsible for h/w, s/w that other people use.
Modern news clients support correct charsets.

I recall Opera has a problem with that as you and John Stubbings
discovered 12 months ago when you both tried to copy/paste my
headers into your forgeries but produced a dogs breakfast. <shrug>


�Q� wrote:
>The 8-bit characters in his Organization header are properly encoded,

Correct.

>but hummingbird is intentionally violating RFCs with the other ones.

Utter bullshit.

>Remember you're dealing with a guy who accidentally put "X-No-Archive"
>in his Keywords header for most of a year,

Eh? I have never "accidentally" put anything in my headers, let
alone "X-No-Archive". Are you losing it or just lying, �Q�?

>not someone who understands headers or charsets.

I'd guess that I know more about these matters than you. But let
your bubble keep inflating if it pleases you...you are a well
known liar and manipulator/twister of the English language.

>Not surprising that he finds the results of his
>own work to be "incomprehensible".

Good attempt at diversion to hide your ignorance, �Q�.

But my original post stands. The sock who posted using
"Anonymous Remailer (Austria)" is using a browser or interface
program to his remailers which only supports 7bit charsets.

It's his problem, not mine. He COULD have corrected his mashup
before he posted but chose not to.

HTH.


--
Confucious says:
"when you have nothing to say, stop saying it"
From: »Q« on 27 Dec 2009 22:14
In <news:a2022d5c1a331c9f4dbc53d2a7d49bc3(a)aracari.127.0.0.1>,
hummingbird <hummingbírd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote:

> Here we have »Q«

Still trying to work out how to filter out my posts using your proxy
server? It's been years since you announced you were planning to -- is
there even an ETA yet? My offer to help you out with Hamster still
stands.

> (who uses two 8bit chars in his posting name
> which causes some news clients/browsers to freak out,

I don't know what browser you're using to read Usenet, but my From
header won't "freak out" any Usenet clients. Unlike yours, my From
header contains no raw 8-bit characters. Clients which don't
understand the Q- and B- encodings will just display the 7-bit
characters in my From header instead of freaking out. Perhaps you freak
out when you see them?

The raw 8-bit characters you use in headers you use are forbidden by
RFCs. You should stop screwing with stuff you don't understand, but I
don't suppose you'll even consider it.

> and who hosts unlawful PL.ISOs on his private server

Your obsession with the imaginary gang of alleged criminals is showing
again. The perfectly lawful PL CD ISOs are at
<http://downloads.remarqs.net/pl/>, among other places.

> debating

There wasn't any debating, just some people taking note of your
numerous very bad misunderstandings about headers in general and the
software you use to break your headers in particular.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: VideoLAN Movie Creator
Next: DumpSec v2.8.6