From: Silvar Beitel on
On Feb 2, 11:29 am, Chris <christopher.man...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> What is the simplest way to get 480Hz from a crystal controlled
> oscillator? Looks like most of the pre-packaged XO's and VCXO, seem
> to put out much higher frequencies. Would a series of dividers be the
> best way?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris KQ6UP

Would a CD4060B + 7.86432 MHz crystal + 1 resistor (maybe 2) + 2 caps
running at 12 volts work for you? Output (rail-to-rail square wave)
from Q14.

--
Silvar Beitel
From: Chris on
On Feb 2, 9:58 am, Silvar Beitel <silverbee...(a)net1plus.com> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 11:29 am, Chris <christopher.man...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What is the simplest way to get 480Hz from a crystal controlled
> > oscillator?  Looks like most of the pre-packaged XO's and VCXO, seem
> > to put out much higher frequencies.  Would a series of dividers be the
> > best way?
>
> > Thanks,
> > Chris KQ6UP
>
> Would a CD4060B + 7.86432 MHz crystal + 1 resistor (maybe 2) + 2 caps
> running at 12 volts work for you?  Output (rail-to-rail square wave)
> from Q14.
>
> --
> Silvar Beitel

That sounds pretty easy divide by 2^14. Would that be a custom
crystal, or a standard freq?

I will be trying to repair a 480Hz standard tuning fork. It is
actually a 960Hz fork that had it's divide by 2 flip flop die. It is
from a 70's vintage piece of equipment. The fork is hermetically
sealed with solder in a can. I try to get in there tonight, and if
the dead part is some obsolete IC or something, I will probably
replace with a crystal and divider to get my 480Hz. A crystal would
be more quiet and stable I believe.

Thanks,
Chris KQ6UP
From: miso on
On Feb 2, 9:05 am, Chris <christopher.man...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 8:46 am, Tim Wescott <t...(a)seemywebsite.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:29:47 -0800, Chris wrote:
> > > What is the simplest way to get 480Hz from a crystal controlled
> > > oscillator?  Looks like most of the pre-packaged XO's and VCXO, seem to
> > > put out much higher frequencies.  Would a series of dividers be the best
> > > way?
>
> > > Thanks,
> > > Chris KQ6UP
>
> > 480Hz what?  Forever constant frequency square wave?  Yes.
>
> No need to vary the frequency.  Yes, square wave 480Hz 12V swing into
> a high Z load.
>
> > If you want to vary the frequency you may want to use a programmable
> > divider, and the easiest way to do _that_ may well be to use a small
> > microprocessor, particularly one with a hardware timer.
>
> For this application the frequency is fixed, but it needs to be
> accurate.  I don't think a xtal oven is called for, but I do need the
> rock.
>
>
>
> > If you want a sine wave you could either divide down to a 480Hz square
> > wave and filter, at the cost of a fairly elaborate analog filter.  Or you
> > could use that microprocessor again to generate a 480Hz almost-sine wave
> > to a DAC or PWM, in which case you can use a much less elaborate (and
> > therefor easier to design and cheaper) analog filter.
>
> Square wave, sorry for not clarifying.
>
>
>
> > If you can live with a healthy bit of output impedance, you could do this
> > with PIC, a resistor, a cap, and either a crystal and it's capacitors or
> > a crystal oscillator that'll be bigger than the PIC.
>
> > --www.wescottdesign.com
>
> Thanks,
> Chris KQ6UP

I'm old school, so I would build two divider chains out of logic
gates. The first divider gets you to 960Hz, but it probably won't be a
square wave. You use a binary counter and some gates to do the
division. Follow up with a divide by two to get a square wave at
480Hz. You need a level shifter to get the larger 12V signal.

You should investigate if the uP scheme causes jitter in the signal.
In the dark ages when I played with uP, they always had peripheral
timer chips that the uP could control so that the division would be
jitter free. Maybe modern uP have these built in.
From: Silvar Beitel on
On Feb 2, 1:34 pm, Chris <christopher.man...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 9:58 am, Silvar Beitel <silverbee...(a)net1plus.com> wrote:

> > Would a CD4060B + 7.86432 MHz crystal + 1 resistor (maybe 2) + 2 caps
> > running at 12 volts work for you? Output (rail-to-rail square wave)
> > from Q14.

> That sounds pretty easy divide by 2^14. Would that be a custom
> crystal, or a standard freq?

Guessing: not standard. But check crystal suppliers / distributors
and see. How close to 480 Hz do you need the output to be? If not
particularly close (i.e. stability is your main requirement), perhaps
a catalog part will work. Good luck.

--
Silvar Beitel
From: Bill Sloman on
On Feb 2, 7:34 pm, Chris <christopher.man...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 9:58 am, Silvar Beitel <silverbee...(a)net1plus.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 11:29 am, Chris <christopher.man...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > What is the simplest way to get 480Hz from a crystal controlled
> > > oscillator?  Looks like most of the pre-packaged XO's and VCXO, seem
> > > to put out much higher frequencies.  Would a series of dividers be the
> > > best way?
>
> > > Thanks,
> > > Chris KQ6UP
>
> > Would a CD4060B + 7.86432 MHz crystal + 1 resistor (maybe 2) + 2 caps
> > running at 12 volts work for you?  Output (rail-to-rail square wave)
> > from Q14.
>
> > --
> > Silvar Beitel
>
> That sounds pretty easy divide by 2^14.  Would that be a custom
> crystal, or a standard freq?

Farnell doesn't stock it, so it probably isn't a standard frequency,
but getting a custom frequency in that range is no big deal.

> I will be trying to repair a 480Hz standard tuning fork.  It is
> actually a 960Hz fork that had it's divide by 2 flip flop die.  It is
> from a 70's vintage piece of equipment.  The fork is hermetically
> sealed with solder in a can.  I try to get in there tonight, and if
> the dead part is some obsolete IC or something, I will probably
> replace with a crystal and divider to get my 480Hz.  A crystal would
> be more quiet and stable I believe.

Probably. Look at the 74HC401013 from NCXP or TI if you want to use a
standard crystal - it gives you a programmable 8-bit divider in a
single package, and you can cascade them if you want more bits

http://www.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/74HC40103.pdf

You will have to buffer the output to get a 12V swing, or use the
slower HEF401013BEY from ST Microelectronics.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Prev: The UT804 bench multimeter
Next: Small genset