From: Skiffle on
If there is this much uncertainty, and apparently there is after reading the
previous threads, then Microsoft should be more specific.

Then again, there are those that would disagree with *my* remark above (i.e.
there is no uncertainty, it is clear).

Skiffle

"Percival P. Cassidy" <Nobody(a)NotMyISP.net> wrote in message
news:hma52g$ol$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>I was just reading the XP Home EULA and noticed that it said it was
>permitted to be used on a single CPU. Since a multi-core processor is
>technically a collection of CPUs -- even if in a single package -- and is
>recognized as such by the OS, has Microsoft ever claimed that it is illegal
>to use XP Home on such a machine?
>
> And I think I read that even XP Pro is licensed for use only on two CPUs.
>
> Perce
>

From: VanguardLH on
Skiffle wrote:

> If there is this much uncertainty, and apparently there is after reading the
> previous threads, then Microsoft should be more specific.

The EULAs were written before the prevalent use use of multi-core
processors. Hell, they were written before dual-core processors were even
available. Just how could they write a EULA to encompass technology that
did not yet exist? Remember that Windows XP was released back in 2001. How
many users have motherboards or hosts that even supported dual-core
processors back then? None.

IBM came out with its dual-core Power4 RISC processor in 2001. AMD's
dual-core showed in 2005 and Intel's in 2006. How would a EULA written back
in 2001 encompass hardware changes made 4, or more, years later?
From: DG on
"Percival P. Cassidy" <Nobody(a)NotMyISP.net> �crivait news:hma52g$ol$1
@news.eternal-september.org:

> I was just reading the XP Home EULA and noticed that it said it was
> permitted to be used on a single CPU. Since a multi-core processor is
> technically a collection of CPUs -- even if in a single package -- and
> is recognized as such by the OS, has Microsoft ever claimed that it is
> illegal to use XP Home on such a machine?
>
> And I think I read that even XP Pro is licensed for use only on two CPUs.
>
> Perce
>

Personnally, I don't ask myself hypothetical question like that. If Windows
installs and ACTIVATES, I'm good to go. My P4 shows 2 processors under
device manager in XP Home, and my Core2Quad shows 4 in Windows7 HOME
Premium, I paid for them and they both activated, so I am entitled to use
them.

Activation process should check these kind of things, if it doesn't, it's
not my problem; and my XP Home machine has been checked many times by WGA,
so...

Of course one computer-one license and OEM licenses die with the first
computer on which they're installed.
From: Leythos on
In article <hma52g$ol$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Nobody(a)NotMyISP.net
says...
> I was just reading the XP Home EULA and noticed that it said it was
> permitted to be used on a single CPU.
>

Microsoft has been clear on this:

A CPU is a single physical CPU device. It doesn't matter if it has
2000000 cores, it's still a single CPU.

--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: John John - MVP on
Leythos wrote:
> In article <hma52g$ol$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Nobody(a)NotMyISP.net
> says...
>> I was just reading the XP Home EULA and noticed that it said it was
>> permitted to be used on a single CPU.
>>
>
> Microsoft has been clear on this:
>
> A CPU is a single physical CPU device. It doesn't matter if it has
> 2000000 cores, it's still a single CPU.

Exactly. And Microsoft made it perfectly clear many years ago that per
processor licensing was unaffected by multi-core processors:


Licensing Microsoft Software on Multicore Processors

On October 19, 2004, Microsoft announced that its server software that
is currently licensed on a per-processor model will continue to be
licensed on a per-processor, and not on a per-core, model. This policy
enables customers to recognize more performance and power from Microsoft
software on a multicore processor system without incurring additional
software licensing fees.

http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/multicore-processor-licensing.aspx

John