Xorg 7.5 and Openmotif applications.
in [Ports]
|
From: Robert Noland on 27 May 2010 10:10 Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:21:19PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:03:08AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote: >>> >>> Alexey Shuvaev wrote: >>>> Hello list! >>>> >>>> There seems to be a known/fixed bug in new xserver that leads to >>>> (many|all?) motif-based applications to malfunction: >>>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25400 >>>> >>>> There are already at least 2 PRs opened against individual ports: >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146383 >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146380 >>>> >>>> I think it is wrong to patch applications when the fault seems to be >>>> in the server. Now I am running patched xserver with the patch pulled >>> >from the upstream git master: >>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=1c612acca8568fcdf9761d23f112adaf4d496f1b >>>> >>>> I confirm that math/grace now works OK (PR 141383). >>>> I'll watch if the patch causes any side effects (nothing so far). >>>> What about dropping attached patch to x11-servers/xorg-server/files? >>>> >>>> Cross-posting to ports@ as the bug already leaked in the individual >>>> ports' PRs. >>> Let's look at updating to 1.7.7 or 1.8.0. I need to poke the commit >>> logs for 1.7.7 and see if it is included. >>> >> Even better so. Just downloaded xorg-server-1.7.7.tar.gz and the patch >> is already there: >> >> [snip] >> >> |--- dix/events.c.orig >> |+++ dix/events.c >> -------------------------- >> Patching file dix/events.c using Plan A... >> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] n >> > Since there was no activity on this issue I have updated xorg-server > to 1.7.7. I have not seen any problems so far. > Any objections against updating xorg-server from 1.7.5 to 1.7.7? > Should I file PR? I have an update to 1.7.7 queued up in my tree along with an updated pixman. It is a little tedious as all of the server based ports need to be updated and drivers need PORTREVISION bumps. I'll try and get it committed in the next couple of days though. robert. > Alexey. > _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Robert Noland on 27 May 2010 10:36 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2010 00:35:02 +0200 > Alexey Shuvaev <shuvaev(a)physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote: > >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:21:19PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: >>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:03:08AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote: >>>> >>>> Alexey Shuvaev wrote: >>>>> Hello list! >>>>> >>>>> There seems to be a known/fixed bug in new xserver that leads to >>>>> (many|all?) motif-based applications to malfunction: >>>>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25400 >>>>> >>>>> There are already at least 2 PRs opened against individual ports: >>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146383 >>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146380 >>>>> >>>>> I think it is wrong to patch applications when the fault seems to be >>>>> in the server. Now I am running patched xserver with the patch pulled >>>> >from the upstream git master: >>>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=1c612acca8568fcdf9761d23f112adaf4d496f1b >>>>> >>>>> I confirm that math/grace now works OK (PR 141383). >>>>> I'll watch if the patch causes any side effects (nothing so far). >>>>> What about dropping attached patch to x11-servers/xorg-server/files? >>>>> >>>>> Cross-posting to ports@ as the bug already leaked in the individual >>>>> ports' PRs. >>>> Let's look at updating to 1.7.7 or 1.8.0. I need to poke the commit >>>> logs for 1.7.7 and see if it is included. >>>> >>> Even better so. Just downloaded xorg-server-1.7.7.tar.gz and the patch >>> is already there: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>> |--- dix/events.c.orig >>> |+++ dix/events.c >>> -------------------------- >>> Patching file dix/events.c using Plan A... >>> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] n >>> >> Since there was no activity on this issue I have updated xorg-server >> to 1.7.7. I have not seen any problems so far. >> Any objections against updating xorg-server from 1.7.5 to 1.7.7? >> Should I file PR? >> > > I think you can remove PORTEPOCH in the patch. If PORTEPOCH has ever been committed, it can not ever be removed. robert. > The patch works for me. I'd say that you should file a PR. > > -- > Gary Jennejohn _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Christian Weisgerber on 27 May 2010 16:20 Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > I think you can remove PORTEPOCH in the patch. You can never, ever turn back PORTEPOCH. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy(a)mips.inka.de _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Christian Weisgerber on 27 May 2010 16:33 Alexey Shuvaev <shuvaev(a)physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote: > Since there was no activity on this issue I have updated xorg-server > to 1.7.7. I have not seen any problems so far. > Any objections against updating xorg-server from 1.7.5 to 1.7.7? Alas, this does not address the problem with mwm(1). -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy(a)mips.inka.de _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Alexey Shuvaev on 27 May 2010 17:17 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:33:12PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Alexey Shuvaev <shuvaev(a)physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote: > > > Since there was no activity on this issue I have updated xorg-server > > to 1.7.7. I have not seen any problems so far. > > Any objections against updating xorg-server from 1.7.5 to 1.7.7? > > Alas, this does not address the problem with mwm(1). > Hmmm... This is something new. I am successfully running math/grace with xorg-server 1.7.7. Could you describe what problems with mwm do you see? Alexey. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: update compat7x to 7.3 libs Next: INDEX build failed for 6.x |