Yes - Checked on other 64 bit machines
in [Device Drivers]
|
Prev: Yes: checked the MSDN - Inf added
Next: SetupCopyOEMInf failing when installing usbser.sys based devic
From: Geoff on 11 May 2010 17:53 Yes - it has been checked on other 64bit machines in our QA - they install without issue I do not have that in my section, what should it look like? Thanks for replying Tim Roberts wrote: Have you tested this on 64-bit machines? 05-May-10 Have you tested this on 64-bit machines? Do you have disk 100 in your [SourceDisksNames] section? -- Tim Roberts, timr(a)probo.com Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. Previous Posts In This Thread: Submitted via EggHeadCafe - Software Developer Portal of Choice WPF Binding Beyond the Limitation of Name Scopes http://www.eggheadcafe.com/tutorials/aspnet/ef583104-e507-491d-b05f-49faac8854c8/wpf-binding-beyond-the-li.aspx
From: Tim Roberts on 12 May 2010 23:24
Geoff Smith wrote: > >Yes - it has been checked on other 64bit machines in our QA - they install without issue > > >I do not have that in my section, what should it look like? Where did you find the INF you currently have? They all have the same basic boilerplate sections. If you look in \Windows\INF, virtually every PnP INF file will have a section like this. SourceDisksNames tells it where to file the file shown in [SourceDisksFiles] [SourceDisksNames] 100 = "This is my install disk name",, -- Tim Roberts, timr(a)probo.com Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. |