You guys still here?
in [Visual Basic]
|
Prev: add initial MSHFLexGrid row number to adodb. recordset
Next: VB6 Error Handing while updating MS database table
From: Tom Shelton on 2 Feb 2010 08:57 On 2010-02-02, David Kerber <ns_dkerber(a)ns_warrenrogersassociates.com> wrote: > In article <Xns9D12AA178A69Bipostthereforeiam(a)207.46.248.16>, > no(a)spam.com says... > > ... > >> I feel a nagging urgency to get an asp.net version of our product out > there >> pronto. > > Why not Delphi, FreeBasic or RealBasic? The conversion effort will > probably be about the same... > > D 1) Since the OP specifically mentioned ASP.NET - that probably means they want to create a web version. I'm not exactly sure any of the options you gave are terribly suited to web programming. A more likely non-.net suggestion would be php, python, ruby, or java. 2) Having converted lots of VB6 code .NET - your assumption is wrong. -- Tom Shelton
From: mayayana on 2 Feb 2010 09:00 > > > I feel a nagging urgency to get an asp.net version of our product out > there > > pronto. > > Why not Delphi, FreeBasic or RealBasic? The conversion effort will > probably be about the same... > As opposed to asp.net? kpg seems to be talking about "web services". If his post is taken seriously, the original "question" seems to be: "I don't have a question, but I'm anxious about missing the cloud bandwagon because it's clearly the height of fashion these days. Are you people in the process of jumping on the cloud bandwagon? Does anyone understand what's going on?" kpg never provided any details, after all. So the question wasn't in any particular context other than AJAX webpage (or something similar) vs installed software.
From: Jeff Johnson on 2 Feb 2010 09:27 "kpg" <no(a)spam.com> wrote in message news:Xns9D12AA178A69Bipostthereforeiam(a)207.46.248.16... Just a gut feeling here, but it seems to me kpg simply failed to do this: <Sarcasm> > I feel a nagging urgency to get an asp.net version of our product out > there > pronto. </Sarcasm> I didn't see it as a troll at all.
From: David Kerber on 2 Feb 2010 09:36 In article <OJ5#n#ApKHA.5328(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>, tom_shelton(a)comcastXXXXXXX.net says... > > On 2010-02-02, David Kerber <ns_dkerber(a)ns_warrenrogersassociates.com> wrote: > > In article <Xns9D12AA178A69Bipostthereforeiam(a)207.46.248.16>, > > no(a)spam.com says... > > > > ... > > > >> I feel a nagging urgency to get an asp.net version of our product out > > there > >> pronto. > > > > Why not Delphi, FreeBasic or RealBasic? The conversion effort will > > probably be about the same... > > > > D > > 1) Since the OP specifically mentioned ASP.NET - that probably means they > want to create a web version. I'm not exactly sure any of the options you > gave are terribly suited to web programming. A more likely non-.net > suggestion would be php, python, ruby, or java. Yeah, good point; I missed that on first reading. > > 2) Having converted lots of VB6 code .NET - your assumption is wrong. Have you ever ported to any of the ones I mentioned so you have a comparison? D
From: Tom Shelton on 2 Feb 2010 11:20
On 2010-02-02, David Kerber <ns_dkerber(a)ns_warrenrogersassociates.com> wrote: > In article <OJ5#n#ApKHA.5328(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>, > tom_shelton(a)comcastXXXXXXX.net says... >> >> On 2010-02-02, David Kerber <ns_dkerber(a)ns_warrenrogersassociates.com> wrote: >> > In article <Xns9D12AA178A69Bipostthereforeiam(a)207.46.248.16>, >> > no(a)spam.com says... >> > >> > ... >> > >> >> I feel a nagging urgency to get an asp.net version of our product out >> > there >> >> pronto. >> > >> > Why not Delphi, FreeBasic or RealBasic? The conversion effort will >> > probably be about the same... >> > >> > D >> >> 1) Since the OP specifically mentioned ASP.NET - that probably means they >> want to create a web version. I'm not exactly sure any of the options you >> gave are terribly suited to web programming. A more likely non-.net >> suggestion would be php, python, ruby, or java. > > Yeah, good point; I missed that on first reading. > > >> >> 2) Having converted lots of VB6 code .NET - your assumption is wrong. > > Have you ever ported to any of the ones I mentioned so you have a > comparison? I've never seen you mention anything... So I can't comment. -- Tom Shelton |