From: David Combs on 30 Dec 2009 22:59 In article <HMOdne8_6c_C46rWnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, Mark Musante <user(a)compgroups.net/> wrote: >It will be one snapshot per dataset, but you can use send/recv recursively as well, so you can treat them as a single snapshot, and generate a single stream to write to tape. > >--- >frmsrcurl: http://compgroups.net/comp.unix.solaris/ZFS-A-nested-zfs-down-within-a-higher-up-zfs-SNAPSHOT-the-top-one-bot-one-done So (considering ALL the responses to this thread thus far), for a one-user machine, the really simplest (and foolproof, least chance of screwup) is to have but ONE zfs, and snapshot THAT, and write IT to tape, etc. Myself -- knowing myself, that is -- having several zfs's (via a a single top-level recursive snapshot) around to write to tape -- seems like way to easy to screw up, to forget to save, etc. (A *professional* sysadmin, of course, might well do it differently.) So, before I cement myself into a design, does what I propose for me, for my single-user machine, sound reasonable enough? SAFE enough? Comments, please... THANKS! David
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: USB Drive: Can't open /dev/rdsk/c2t0d0s2: I/O error Next: problem booting from dvd |