From: David Combs on
In article <HMOdne8_6c_C46rWnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>,
Mark Musante <user(a)compgroups.net/> wrote:
>It will be one snapshot per dataset, but you can use send/recv recursively as well, so you can treat them as a single snapshot, and generate a single stream to write to tape.
>
>---
>frmsrcurl: http://compgroups.net/comp.unix.solaris/ZFS-A-nested-zfs-down-within-a-higher-up-zfs-SNAPSHOT-the-top-one-bot-one-done

So (considering ALL the responses to this thread thus far), for a one-user
machine, the really simplest (and foolproof, least chance of screwup) is
to have but ONE zfs, and snapshot THAT, and write IT to tape,
etc.

Myself -- knowing myself, that is -- having several zfs's
(via a a single top-level recursive snapshot)
around to write to tape -- seems like way to easy
to screw up, to forget to save, etc.

(A *professional* sysadmin, of course, might well do
it differently.)

So, before I cement myself into a design, does what I
propose for me, for my single-user machine, sound reasonable
enough?

SAFE enough?

Comments, please...


THANKS!

David