about an experiment that should have been done a 100 years back and the origins of magnetism
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Salt on Venus
Next: Quantum Gravity 397.8: India Relates Orbits in Finite Abelian Groups to Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
From: abhilash j pillai on 31 May 2010 09:38 in science definite causes should have definite results. so is it possible for two observers(both in the same frame of reference ) to have two different results or effects for the same or similar cause - thank you
From: Uncle Al on 31 May 2010 10:20 abhilash j pillai wrote: > > in science definite causes should have definite results. Neither quantum mechanics nor quantum field theory is deterministic. The only apparent constraint is that observations be consistent. The universe does not tolerate paradox. > so is it > possible for two observers(both in the same frame of reference ) to > have two different results or effects for the same or similar cause - > thank you A relativistic universe has four distinct distances: luminosity (inverse square), angular diameter, parallax, and proper motion. No two of them need agree to maintain consistency. Clocks can only be synchronized by being local. All that is only classical physics, h = zero. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: abhilash j pillai on 31 May 2010 11:53
hello thank you for your reply i was talking about classical physics including electrodynamics so pls read in classical science definite causes should have definite results. so is it possible for two observers(both in the same frame of reference ) to have two different results or effects for the same or similar cause - thank you |