From: Red Tomato on 2 Apr 2010 21:02 Can anyone recommend an active xhtml newsgroup? thanx
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 2 Apr 2010 22:24 Red Tomato wrote: > Can anyone recommend an active xhtml newsgroup? STFW. PointedEars -- Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web, when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee
From: "Michael Haufe ("TNO")" on 2 Apr 2010 22:57 On Apr 2, 9:24 pm, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedE...(a)web.de> wrote: > STFW. Save Those Friendly Whales? I agree.
From: Hans-Georg Michna on 3 Apr 2010 06:20 On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:02:10 -0500, Red Tomato wrote: >Can anyone recommend an active xhtml newsgroup? I know only the not XHTML-specific: comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html and the Microsoft-based, Expression-Web-centric: microsoft.public.expression.webdesigner There may be others. By the way, many of the experts recommend against XHTML and for HTML. They have some good reasons. Some details can be found at http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml . Hans-Georg
From: Jorge on 3 Apr 2010 07:29 On Apr 3, 12:20 pm, Hans-Georg Michna <hans- georgNoEmailPle...(a)michna.com> wrote: > (...) > By the way, many of the experts recommend against XHTML and for > HTML. They have some good reasons. Some details can be found athttp://www..hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml. And @webkit.org: http://google.com/search?q=xhtml+site:webkit.org -- Jorge.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: jQuery crashes again Next: Where to put javascript in the HTML page? Header or body? |