Prev: -> Higher Infinities
Next: JSH: Judging difficulty
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 19 Jun 2010 14:20
An interesting prospect would be to see whether the planets and
satellites have a
chemical composition more in keeping with a additive creation versus
multiplicative.

In Dirac's book, Directions in Physics, he computes that the Moon
would recede
from Earth if multiplicative creation by 2cm/year and would approach
Earth by
2cm/year if additive creation.

So in this edition of this book, I am wanting a better experiment to
decide between
additive and multiplicative creation because the detection of motion
of 2cm/year is
too messy and complex of a task with something so complicated as the
motion of
the Moon with such a small measure of 2cm/year. So I believe the
chemistry of
New Radioactivities is a far far better proof scheme, such as the
Comet water
is 320ppm versus Earth's 160ppm.

Now in additive creation, the formation of new matter occurs where
matter
already exists, and little to no new matter where there is absence of
existing
matter. In multiplicative creation, there is new matter arising
everywhere. A mathematical example is the logarithmic spiral or the
fractals that as they become larger, they
keep their same shape. So the logarithmic spiral is multiplicative
creation. An example
of additive creation is the tree rings of a tree or the growth of a
tree.

So, now, let us check what the growth pattern of the chemical elements
for the planets and
moons have been? We really have access to only one astro body of its
interior composition,
our Earth. And the question would be, has the Earth grown from a
multiplicative creation
or a additive creation of Dirac New Radioactivities?

And here, we also must include what the Big Bang via Nebular Dust
Cloud theory would say
of chemical composition in that the planets were created from a
gravitational lumping together
of planetesimals.

Correct me if wrong, but I understand of the data and facts of
chemical composition of Earth
and stars is that the elements of thorium, uranium are seemingly
overabundant for what they
should be compared to neighboring elements on the periodic chart. That
for some reason
of creation process, the elements of thorium and uranium are
overabundant once we go
beyond bismuth as the last stable isotope of the periodic chart. And
this thorium and uranium
overabundance can be seen on Earth chemistry and in stars where we can
check spectroscopically.

In an earlier edition of this book I relied on a publication of the
1980s on the cosmic
abundance of the chemical elements and it seems as though noone in the
science
community is making that data up to date. If I remember correctly,
someone in Europe,
Holland? was keeping the data of cosmic abundance of elements. But
whether anyone
is making that data an ongoing up to date event is worrisome. Some
physics data should
be a recurring up to date report and the cosmic abundance of elements
is one of those
important needed reports. I have to search through my previous
editions to find that reference. But basically, what I recall is that
the abundance of
chemical elements decreases the higher the atomic number. And that
after lead
and bismuth, there are few atoms of any elements except for thorium
and uranium
and these two are just as abundant as many of the elements lower in
atomic number
than bismuth. This seems to be a astronomical truth and fact and data
that is
highly reliable. That thorium and uranium are as abundant as a
nonradioactive
element of lower atomic number.

This fact or data disproves the multiplicative creation process, for
you cannot have
a overabundant thorium and uranium in that process. This fact and data
also
disproves the Nebular Dust Cloud creation process of gravity as the
creator of our
planets, and also, the abundance of uranium and thorium on the surface
of Earth
is contradictory to gravity and Nebular Dust Cloud.

The cosmic abundance and distribution of thorium and uranium support
only one
creation process-- Dirac's new radioactivities of additive creation.
As I started with
analogies of a tree ring growth or a tree in general, that the rings
are rather uniform
and so the amount of thorium and uranium as overabundant is uniform in
each layer
of a star or layer of Earth. So we can expect overabundant thorium and
uranium atoms
given any layer of Earth or a star.

If multiplicative creation and Nebular Dust Cloud creation were true,
we could expect that
the center of Earth is not a iron core but rather a thorium uranium
core center. And especially
Jupiter. But we see none of that.

The chemical composition and abundance point to Additive Creation as
the true process.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: -> Higher Infinities
Next: JSH: Judging difficulty