From: Rod Pemberton on 26 Sep 2007 22:28 "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have(a)nowhere.cmm> wrote in message news:fdd8ib$k7a$1(a)aioe.org... > "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have(a)nowhere.cmm> wrote in message > news:fdd545$aqa$1(a)aioe.org... > > "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have(a)nowhere.cmm> wrote in message > > news:fd6trd$tha$1(a)aioe.org... > > > "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have(a)nowhere.cmm> wrote in message > > > news:fd43de$9v8$1(a)aioe.org... > > > > "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have(a)nowhere.cmm> wrote in message > > > > news:fd413k$3v4$1(a)aioe.org... > > > > > "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:1190480060.304450.255970(a)n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > Testing feedback would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > 9/22 same... [2nd stage not loaded - halted] > > > > > > 9/23 changed... > > > FDC failed - halted > > > > 9/24 changed... > > 06 (on green background) > > 9/26 int 40h fix, same... 06 Rod Pemberton
From: Mike Gonta on 27 Sep 2007 05:47 On Sep 26, 5:28 am, "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_h...(a)nowhere.cmm> wrote: > "...many 386 BIOSes emulate the 80286 undocumented LOADALL instruction which > was removed from the 80386+" > > Now, I'm wondering if 286 LOADALL is actually the invalid opcode? Hi Rod, I have added support for the detection of the 286 loadall opcode (0F05h) and the 386 loadall opcode (0F07h) to the PM int 6 handler in version 20070927. The latest aeBIOS version is here http://mikegonta.com/aeBIOS Mike Gonta look and see - many look but few see
From: Rod Pemberton on 27 Sep 2007 08:03 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:1190886458.229966.259840(a)g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > I have added support for the detection of the 286 loadall opcode > (0F05h) and > the 386 loadall opcode (0F07h) to the PM int 6 handler in version > 20070927. > The latest aeBIOS version is here (2nd...) Thanks, but it's still a 06. It probably would've been better to output the cs:ip and code (or hex byte sequence) that's failing... Rod Pemberton
From: s_dubrovich on 28 Sep 2007 11:11 On Sep 27, 3:47 am, Mike Gonta <mikego...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 26, 5:28 am, "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_h...(a)nowhere.cmm> wrote: > > > "...many 386 BIOSes emulate the 80286 undocumented LOADALL instruction which > > was removed from the 80386+" > > > Now, I'm wondering if 286 LOADALL is actually the invalid opcode? > > Hi Rod, > > I have added support for the detection of the 286 loadall opcode > (0F05h) and > the 386 loadall opcode (0F07h) to the PM int 6 handler in version > 20070927. > The latest aeBIOS version is here > > http://mikegonta.com/aeBIOS > > Mike Gonta > > look and see - many look but few see v 20070927 Gives error 'floppy disk read failed - press any key'. on Pentium mmx dell laptop. :( Boots OK to 'Hello World..' on Pentium II Dell Desktop now :) Steve
From: Mike Gonta on 29 Sep 2007 18:25
On Sep 28, 11:11 am, s_dubrov...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > v 20070927 > Gives error 'floppy disk read failed - press any key'. > on Pentium mmx dell laptop. :( Thanks Steve, I'm still having issues with int 40h, there is a partial fix in the latest version. http://mikegonta.com/aeBIOS Mike Gonta look and see - many look but few see |