From: Cor Ligthert[MVP] on 8 Jun 2010 04:51 Not that much. However, it is impossible to develop a Windows 7 application on Windows 98 While you still can make Windows 98 applications on Windows 7 Cor "D-Someone" <DSomeone(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:9B60EF67-012F-4B7C-98D3-1A751125ABB2(a)microsoft.com... > > This is unrealistic. > > > "Mr. Arnold" wrote: > >> The rule of thumb I always follow is develop, compile and build the >> application on the platform it's intended to run on. That means you >> develop, compile, and build the application on Win 7 64 machine to be >> deployed to a Win 7 64 machines -- Windows XP machine to Windows XP >> machines, Vista machine to Vista machines, etc. etc. >> . >> >
From: Willem van Rumpt on 8 Jun 2010 05:56 Cor Ligthert[MVP] wrote: > Not that much. > > However, it is impossible to develop a Windows 7 application on Windows 98 > > While you still can make Windows 98 applications on Windows 7 > > Cor > Hmmm...i'd love to see that in a development process...maintaining about a dozen codebases and distributables. And what if a customer upgrades / downgrades to a different OS? Test on the expected range of OS's, absolutely. But build and develop per OS? -- Willem van Rumpt
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Crystal Reports in VB.NET Express Edition Next: keep changes are made on datasource. |