Prev: Anybody mind to translate this Felleisen quote from German to English
Next: Macros and anonymous functions
From: Tim Bradshaw on 2 Mar 2010 13:43 On 2010-03-02 17:11:22 +0000, Tamas K Papp said: > A somewhat tangential question: lately I am gravitating towards > SPOTTED-DOG? instead of SPOTTED-DOG-P. Is that "bad style" in CL? Looks > so much nicer, and appears more intuitive to me. Disgusting scheme heathen, please report for burning.
From: Slobodan Blazeski on 2 Mar 2010 14:01 On Mar 2, 6:11 pm, Tamas K Papp <tkp...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:01:37 +0000, Tim Bradshaw wrote: > > In another newsgroup, someone is complaining fiercely that > > "SPOTTED-DOG-P" does not subtract "P" and "DOG" from "SPOTTED". > > A somewhat tangential question: lately I am gravitating towards > SPOTTED-DOG? instead of SPOTTED-DOG-P. Is that "bad style" in CL? Looks > so much nicer, and appears more intuitive to me. > > Tamas When I realized that I've also realized that I'm a closeted Schemer. Slobodan
From: Raffael Cavallaro on 2 Mar 2010 14:04 On 2010-03-02 12:59:23 -0500, Ron Garret said: > I don't use autocompletion myself because the > CCL IDE doesn't have it so I tend to forget about it. ../ (i.e., meta-/) -- Raffael Cavallaro
From: Raffael Cavallaro on 2 Mar 2010 14:09 On 2010-03-02 14:04:33 -0500, Raffael Cavallaro said: > ./ (i.e., meta-/) hmm, don't know how that came out that way: ⌥/ (i.e., meta-/) -- Raffael Cavallaro
From: Raffael Cavallaro on 2 Mar 2010 14:17
On 2010-03-02 11:29:37 -0500, Ron Garret said: > If you see a > Chinese character or a sign language gesture that you don't know, > there's no way to look it up. Well I can't speak to ASL, but this isn't true of chinese - there are chinese dictionaries - you look characters up by their constituent radicals. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_(Chinese_character)> -- Raffael Cavallaro |