From: io_x on 3 Jul 2010 01:16 i would, in a multithread application, one tread would push one button of the application i would post one message "click the Button ID ID_BUTTON" PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, ID_BUTTON, ID_BUTTON) is the above right way to do that? PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, 1, ID_BUTTON) PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, 0, ID_BUTTON) not push the button
From: io_x on 3 Jul 2010 09:25 "io_x" <a(a)b.c.invalid> ha scritto nel messaggio news:4c2ec54a$0$40280$4fafbaef(a)reader2.news.tin.it... >i would, in a multithread application, one tread would push one button > of the application > i would post one message "click the Button ID ID_BUTTON" > > PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, ID_BUTTON, ID_BUTTON) never mind, it is PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, ID_BUTTON, 1) > is the above right way to do that? > > PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, 1, ID_BUTTON) > PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, 0, ID_BUTTON) > not push the button > > >
From: io_x on 5 Jul 2010 06:44 "io_x" <a(a)b.c.invalid> ha scritto nel messaggio news:4c2f37dd$0$31376$4fafbaef(a)reader1.news.tin.it... > > "io_x" <a(a)b.c.invalid> ha scritto nel messaggio > news:4c2ec54a$0$40280$4fafbaef(a)reader2.news.tin.it... >>i would, in a multithread application, one tread would push one button >> of the application >> i would post one message "click the Button ID ID_BUTTON" >> >> PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, ID_BUTTON, ID_BUTTON) > > never mind, it is > PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, ID_BUTTON, 1) what about invent button never exist only for post messages: example PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, IDNonID, array_to_print_inMsg_err) >> is the above right way to do that? >> >> PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, 1, ID_BUTTON) >> PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, 0, ID_BUTTON) >> not push the button >> >> >> > > >
From: Dee Earley on 5 Jul 2010 06:58 On 03/07/2010 06:16, io_x wrote: > i would, in a multithread application, one tread would push one button > of the application > i would post one message "click the Button ID ID_BUTTON" > > PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, ID_BUTTON, ID_BUTTON) > > is the above right way to do that? > > PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, 1, ID_BUTTON) > PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, 0, ID_BUTTON) > not push the button Why not just use your own message? -- Dee Earley (dee.earley(a)icode.co.uk) i-Catcher Development Team iCode Systems (Replies direct to my email address will be ignored. Please reply to the group.)
From: io_x on 5 Jul 2010 15:08 "io_x" <a(a)b.c.invalid> ha scritto nel messaggio news:4c31b545$0$31380$4fafbaef(a)reader1.news.tin.it... > > "io_x" <a(a)b.c.invalid> ha scritto nel messaggio > news:4c2f37dd$0$31376$4fafbaef(a)reader1.news.tin.it... >> >> "io_x" <a(a)b.c.invalid> ha scritto nel messaggio >> news:4c2ec54a$0$40280$4fafbaef(a)reader2.news.tin.it... >>>i would, in a multithread application, one tread would push one button >>> of the application >>> i would post one message "click the Button ID ID_BUTTON" >>> >>> PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, ID_BUTTON, ID_BUTTON) >> >> never mind, it is >> PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, ID_BUTTON, 1) > > what about invent button never exist only for post messages: > example > PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, IDNonID, array_to_print_inMsg_err) what about doing all the treads read-write to the subwindows using only PostMessage() function? could be ok only one subwindows is read-write from only one thread? i had problem with the dialog function when using Sleep() so i convince myself that in one dialog function never use Sleep(); all to be asycronus all using postmessage() and easy and fast functions >>> is the above right way to do that? >>> >>> PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, 1, ID_BUTTON) >>> PostMessage(windowhandle, WM_COMMAND, 0, ID_BUTTON) >>> not push the button >>>
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Is app running sandboxed or in a virtual environment? Next: ANN: Seed7 Release 2010-07-04 |