atomic characteristics appearing as cosmic characteristics; voids are a better distance measure than redshift chapt18; Galaxy evidence #266 Atom Totality
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Why relativity and other theories do not work in small scale?
Next: Quantum Gravity 405.7: 3 "Spatial Dimensions" vs 1 Dimensional Analysis Fundamental Spatial Dimension L (usually)
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 8 Aug 2010 12:45 http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/wnearsc.gif http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/nearsc.html If we look at those two pictures of the distribution of galaxies overall we do sense two poles. We must keep in mind that the redshift of galaxies is not a good, nor an accurate measure of distance and so if we had a accurate distance measure other than the "redshift" the poles of the Cosmos would be clearer and those two pictures above would be more symmetrical. The symmetry I speak of is that the Hercules Supercluster is a North Pole of galaxies and the Columba supercluster is the South Pole of galaxies. In between those two poles lines a line-of-galaxies comprising Centaurus supercluster, Virgo supercluster, Perseus-Pisces supercluster. What lies opposite this polar caps of supercluster and the line-of- galaxies is mostly Voids. What this symmetry proves is that the Cosmos has two poles and what that proves is the Cosmos has a "spin". Spin only comes for a Atom Totality theory, and not a Big Bang theory. The placement of Voids in those pictures shows them to be symmetrical as a line-of-Voids that is 90 degrees opposite the line-of-galaxies. The trouble in all of this is that "redshift" of galactic motion is considered to be a distance measure when in fact it is not a distance measure at all, as proven by the simple greenhouse plastic sheet experiment of a redshifted auto headlight moving towards us. So that many of those galaxies are actually moving towards the Milky Way and not away from the Milky Way. The distances of galaxies from us is also very much mistaken in those pictures and the pictures given by Juric and Jarrett: http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~mjuric/universe/all100.gif http://www.astro.princeton.edu/universe/ http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/papers/LSS/ But what cannot be mistaken or corrupted are the placement of the VOIDS between galaxies. The Voids are symmetrical as lying in the pictures above at 90 degrees opposite that line-of-galaxies of Centaurus to Virgo to Perseus-Pisces. Since the Voids are symmetrical means the galaxies themselves must be symmetrical. And so the above pictures, all have to be revised. The redshift cannot be used to tell us much of anything. And, actually, and surprisingly, the most useful determinant is the Voids. We can tell distance and position, better by using Voids than we can by using redshift. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |