Prev: Aftermarket lens makers continue to cater solely to Canon and Nikon
Next: [SI] Ten days left for Rogues II
From: Val Hallah on 12 Aug 2010 06:55 http://www.lakesuperiorphoto.com/northern_lights_aug_2010/slides/northern_lights_aurora_michigan_lake_superior_2010.html
From: Nervous Nick on 12 Aug 2010 15:48 On Aug 12, 5:55 am, Val Hallah <michaelnewp...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > http://www.lakesuperiorphoto.com/northern_lights_aug_2010/slides/nort... Nice watermark.
From: GregS on 12 Aug 2010 16:19 In article <cdf81abf-655b-4304-ad30-265656b07f1d(a)z28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, Nervous Nick <nervous.nick(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Aug 12, 5:55=A0am, Val Hallah <michaelnewp...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> http://www.lakesuperiorphoto.com/northern_lights_aug_2010/slides/nort... > >Nice watermark. Since the sun has changed magnetic polarity and is now going to cool, I wonder how that might affect the display. Hope we never see a magnetic reversal. Its deadly. I don't see anything "nice" about the watermark. greg
From: Nervous Nick on 12 Aug 2010 21:07 On Aug 12, 3:19 pm, zekfr...(a)zekfrivolous.com (GregS) wrote: > In article <cdf81abf-655b-4304-ad30-265656b07...(a)z28g2000yqh.googlegroups..com>, Nervous Nick <nervous.n...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I don't see anything "nice" about the watermark. WHOOSH!
From: David J Taylor on 13 Aug 2010 06:19
... and for a more unusual view of the Aurora Australis - without the watermark - see: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=44348&src=eoa-iotd http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/44000/44348/ISS023-E-58455_lrg.jpg Cheers, David |