From: Merciadri Luca on
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sat,10.Apr.10, 08:51:16, Clive McBarton wrote:
>
>
>
> It doesn't matter. Mixing apt-get and aptitude is not a problem anymore.
>
Sure? How can you state this? Any proof? I always thought that they were
incompatible.

--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail
client, please contact me.




From: Andrei Popescu on
On Sat,10.Apr.10, 11:38:08, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > It doesn't matter. Mixing apt-get and aptitude is not a problem anymore.
> >
> Sure? How can you state this? Any proof? I always thought that they were
> incompatible.

I'm not sure what I can do to prove that something doesn't exist. I
could for example post the console output of:

# apt-get update
# apt-get upgrade
# aptitude safe-upgrade

(using apt-get do a partial upgrade and letting aptitude finish the
job[1][2])

but I'm not sure how relevant this is. Sure there are differences in
*behavior*, but I'm not aware of any recent incompatibilities. If you
find any such incompatibilities please do report them as I'm sure both
the developers of apt and aptitude would like to know about them.

[1] 'aptitude safe-upgrade' installs new packages while
'apt-get upgrade' doesn't, but this is both expected and documented
behaviour

[2] and in case you're wondering, yes, I just did that on my sid
machine, but the console output is rather long.

Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
From: Merciadri Luca on
Okay. Thanks for these precisions.

Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sat,10.Apr.10, 11:38:08, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>
> I'm not sure what I can do to prove that something doesn't exist. I
> could for example post the console output of:
>
> # apt-get update
> # apt-get upgrade
> # aptitude safe-upgrade
>
> (using apt-get do a partial upgrade and letting aptitude finish the
> job[1][2])
>
> but I'm not sure how relevant this is. Sure there are differences in
> *behavior*, but I'm not aware of any recent incompatibilities. If you
> find any such incompatibilities please do report them as I'm sure both
> the developers of apt and aptitude would like to know about them.
>
> [1] 'aptitude safe-upgrade' installs new packages while
> 'apt-get upgrade' doesn't, but this is both expected and documented
> behaviour
>
> [2] and in case you're wondering, yes, I just did that on my sid
> machine, but the console output is rather long.
>
> Regards,
> Andrei
>


--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail
client, please contact me.




From: Osamu Aoki on
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:09:58PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sat,10.Apr.10, 11:38:08, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> > Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > > It doesn't matter. Mixing apt-get and aptitude is not a problem anymore.
> > >
> > Sure? How can you state this? Any proof? I always thought that they were
> > incompatible.
>
> I'm not sure what I can do to prove that something doesn't exist. I
> could for example post the console output of:

I guess this was the big headach
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=411123



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100410104329.GA366(a)osamu.debian.net
From: Merciadri Luca on
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:09:58PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
>
> I guess this was the big headach
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=411123
>
>
>
>
_was_ or _is still_?

--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail
client, please contact me.


Damned if you do, damned if you don't.