Prev: The gravitational field as a preferred frame
Next: Some Contradictory Claims of SR.
From: Androcles on 8 Jun 2010 04:50

"ben6993" <ben6993(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0f58e62a-d6d2-4f35-979b-df8724a16a62(a)c33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

Although the usefulness of the ruler applies all the time, the ruler
is actually shorter in the direction of travel, according to special
relativity.
==============================================
The ruler is fictionally longer in the direction of travel, according to
special relativity.
Learn that xi is a travelling length and xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
according to special relativity.
Division be something less than one gives a quotient greater than
x-vt.
You are LYING.



From: Y.Porat on 8 Jun 2010 05:30
On Jun 8, 10:50 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote:
> "ben6993" <ben6...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:0f58e62a-d6d2-4f35-979b-df8724a16a62(a)c33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>
> Although the usefulness of the ruler applies all the time, the ruler
> is actually shorter in the direction of travel, according to special
> relativity.
> ==============================================
> The ruler is fictionally longer in the direction of travel, according to
> special relativity.
> Learn that xi is a travelling length and xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
> according to special relativity.
> Division be something less than one gives a quotient greater than
> x-vt.
> You are LYING.

------------------
and in addition to Andro

SR has nothing to do with photon momentum
since the photon moves at constant c
is all frames
no matter if the orriginal frame
or the secondary frame !!
so
no Gama factor there
and no relativistic mass for it
AND NO 'SCHMELATIVISTIC' MASS FOR IT
'btw IIRC
even Einstein himself as time passed
''was not 'happy' with the concept
'relativistic mass"!!!


JUST ONE KIND OF** MASS** EVERY WHERE !!!
AND ANY TIME
2
NO MASS (THE ONLY ONE - NO REAL PHYSICS !!
(said old Catto ) (:-)
3
in in a second thinking
a vector can be defined by the Polar system
ie
a start point and
direction of polar angle !!

ATB
Y.Porat
-------------------------
From: Androcles on 8 Jun 2010 08:54

<paparios(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ed5cb1c1-0f72-4109-8ec3-2ffa6cf2cb67(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
| On 8 jun, 04:50, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote:
| > "ben6993" <ben6...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
| >
|
| > ==============================================
| > The ruler is fictionally longer in the direction of travel, according to
| > special relativity.
| > Learn that xi is a travelling length and xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
| > according to special relativity.
| > Division be something less than one gives a quotient greater than
| > x-vt.
| > You are LYING.
|
| No! Androalzheimer....x'=(x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) is the coordinate on
| the moving frame,

So x' is greater than (x-vt), you fuckin' deranged imbecile. QED.

From: paparios on 8 Jun 2010 09:27
On 8 jun, 08:54, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote:
> <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:ed5cb1c1-0f72-4109-8ec3-2ffa6cf2cb67(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> | On 8 jun, 04:50, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote:
> | > "ben6993" <ben6...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> | >
> |
> | > ==============================================
> | > The ruler is fictionally longer in the direction of travel, according to
> | > special relativity.
> | > Learn that xi is a travelling length and xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
> | > according to special relativity.
> | > Division be something less than one gives a quotient greater than
> | > x-vt.
> | > You are LYING.
> |
> | No! Androalzheimer....x'=(x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) is the coordinate on
> | the moving frame,
>
> So x' is greater than (x-vt),  you fuckin' deranged imbecile. QED.

Yes Andromoronic, but x' IS NOT a "travelling length" as you so
funnily assert , got that stupid bigot?
x' is just a COORDINATE in the K' frame.

Miguel Rios
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: The gravitational field as a preferred frame
Next: Some Contradictory Claims of SR.