ben6993 is a LIAR.
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation proves Atom Totality and dismisses Big Bang Chapt 3 #148; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: how many BP-type oil spills to kill-off the entire ocean system? And would that extinct humanity? #66 Volcano-Electricity to make oil/coal obsolete
From: Androcles on 8 Jun 2010 04:50 "ben6993" <ben6993(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:0f58e62a-d6d2-4f35-979b-df8724a16a62(a)c33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... Although the usefulness of the ruler applies all the time, the ruler is actually shorter in the direction of travel, according to special relativity. ============================================== The ruler is fictionally longer in the direction of travel, according to special relativity. Learn that xi is a travelling length and xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) according to special relativity. Division be something less than one gives a quotient greater than x-vt. You are LYING.
From: Y.Porat on 8 Jun 2010 05:30 On Jun 8, 10:50 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > "ben6993" <ben6...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:0f58e62a-d6d2-4f35-979b-df8724a16a62(a)c33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > Although the usefulness of the ruler applies all the time, the ruler > is actually shorter in the direction of travel, according to special > relativity. > ============================================== > The ruler is fictionally longer in the direction of travel, according to > special relativity. > Learn that xi is a travelling length and xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) > according to special relativity. > Division be something less than one gives a quotient greater than > x-vt. > You are LYING. ------------------ and in addition to Andro SR has nothing to do with photon momentum since the photon moves at constant c is all frames no matter if the orriginal frame or the secondary frame !! so no Gama factor there and no relativistic mass for it AND NO 'SCHMELATIVISTIC' MASS FOR IT 'btw IIRC even Einstein himself as time passed ''was not 'happy' with the concept 'relativistic mass"!!! JUST ONE KIND OF** MASS** EVERY WHERE !!! AND ANY TIME 2 NO MASS (THE ONLY ONE - NO REAL PHYSICS !! (said old Catto ) (:-) 3 in in a second thinking a vector can be defined by the Polar system ie a start point and direction of polar angle !! ATB Y.Porat -------------------------
From: Androcles on 8 Jun 2010 08:54 <paparios(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:ed5cb1c1-0f72-4109-8ec3-2ffa6cf2cb67(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... | On 8 jun, 04:50, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: | > "ben6993" <ben6...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message | > | | > ============================================== | > The ruler is fictionally longer in the direction of travel, according to | > special relativity. | > Learn that xi is a travelling length and xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) | > according to special relativity. | > Division be something less than one gives a quotient greater than | > x-vt. | > You are LYING. | | No! Androalzheimer....x'=(x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) is the coordinate on | the moving frame, So x' is greater than (x-vt), you fuckin' deranged imbecile. QED.
From: paparios on 8 Jun 2010 09:27
On 8 jun, 08:54, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:ed5cb1c1-0f72-4109-8ec3-2ffa6cf2cb67(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > | On 8 jun, 04:50, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > | > "ben6993" <ben6...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > | > > | > | > ============================================== > | > The ruler is fictionally longer in the direction of travel, according to > | > special relativity. > | > Learn that xi is a travelling length and xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) > | > according to special relativity. > | > Division be something less than one gives a quotient greater than > | > x-vt. > | > You are LYING. > | > | No! Androalzheimer....x'=(x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) is the coordinate on > | the moving frame, > > So x' is greater than (x-vt), you fuckin' deranged imbecile. QED. Yes Andromoronic, but x' IS NOT a "travelling length" as you so funnily assert , got that stupid bigot? x' is just a COORDINATE in the K' frame. Miguel Rios |