Prev: NB Re: Sqillionaire club was Re: Mayhem was Re: Beaming was Re: Delphiwas Re: InfoPathwys
Next: NB Re: Sqillionaire club was Re: Mayhem was Re: Beaming was Re:Delphi was Re: InfoPathwys
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 29 Jun 2010 15:12 Let me try to give an example for the layperson who has never studied physics and blackbody radiation. An example as to why the Big Bang theory is defeated and trashed, upon news that the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation CMBR is blackbody. Suppose your house is the Universe and inside your house someone has a 20 liter bucket of water to simulate as a Big Bang explosion. Now when this bucket of water is pitched inside the house, well, it is going to fly everywhere and puddle and pool and soak some things. That would be a Big Bang where the water simulates CMBR. However, suppose that same bucket of water was near the bathtub and was slowly and gently poured into the bathtub. The bathtub, like our Cosmos is a structure, an entity and as the water is poured into the bathtub slowly it captures all the water and the water is blackbody imprinted. But enough of a analogy. The fact that the CMBR is microwave blackbody radiation is a fact that immediately dismisses the Big Bang theory as a fake theory. Just as the fact that the Oceans were reported to have rifts and sea floor spreading was enough of a fact to dismiss the Static Earth theory before the Continental Drift theory. Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:32:13 -0700 Subject: #28w the latest CMBR, for it was 2.735 + 0.06 K in the 1990s Re: ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY REPLACES BIG BANG THEORY IN PHYSICS The way DeBroglie has it set up in his book: The book LA THERMODYNAMIQUE DE LA PARTICULE ISOLEE (OU THERMODYNAMIQUE CACHEE DES PARTICULES) From pages 94-101, Debroglie works with the formula 1/T = dS/dL That the blackbody cavities of atoms and electrons (and possibly protons) are clustered in a specified range of values. They give 1 degree Kelvin when the exponent is zero Then they give a large cluster of values around 2.71 degrees Kelvin because the exponent in most electrons would be close to the value of 1. Blackbody cavities do not seem to reach 3.14....degrees Kelvin. Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 10:11:29 -0700 Subject: #21C the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Temperature would be in Hydrogen through Plutonium Atom Totalities Re: ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY REPLACES BIG BANG THEORY IN PHYSICS a_plutonium wrote: (snipped) > So I need to find out what our present day "best Kelvin temperature" > is. In the 1990s the best we could do was 2.735 + 0.06 K. > The book LA THERMODYNAMIQUE DE LA PARTICULE ISOLEE > (OU THERMODYNAMIQUE CACHEE DES PARTICULES) > written by > Debroglie, 1964, considers the relativistic > fluctuations of mass of > subatomic particles such as the protons, electrons. > And then associates > temperature with a relativistic statistical mechanic. > I am following Debroglie's intuition, except > replacing relativistic > mass fluctuations with statistical quantum > fluctuations of the Coulomb > interactions for a plutonium atom in order to derive > an intrinsic > associated temperature for an electron cavity, which > is simply the > space occupied by an electron of 231 plutonium atom. > Let me use 95!/2 or either 232!/2 as the "Coulombic > states" and with > this large number of statistical interactions, I > propose to find an > intrinsic temperature for the 94th electron of an > isolated plutonium > atom. > From pages 94-101, Debroglie works with the formula > 1/T = dS/dL > where T is temperature, dS is the derivative of > entropy with respect to I did some looking to find what our most current precise measure of the CMBR is. I found this: --- quoting Nature journal --- Nature 408, 931-935 (21 December 2000) | doi:10.1038/35050020; Received 7 August 2000; Accepted 3 November 2000 The cosmic microwave background radiation temperature at a redshift of 2.34 R. Srianand1, P. Petitjean2,3 and C. Ledoux4 1. IUCAA, Post Bag 4, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411 007, India 2. Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris-CNRS, 98bis Boulevard Arago, F-75014 Paris, France 3. CNRS 173-DAEC, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, F-92195 Meudon Cedex, France 4. European Southern Observatory, Karl Schwarzschild Strasse 2, D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany Correspondence to: Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.S. (e-mail: Email: an...(a)iucaa.ernet.in). Top of page Abstract The existence of the cosmic microwave background radiation is a fundamental prediction of hot Big Bang cosmology, and its temperature should increase with increasing redshift. At the present time (redshift z = 0), the temperature has been determined with high precision to be TCMBR(0) = 2.726 plusminus 0.010 K. --- end quoting Nature journal --- Apparently those scientists believe the CMBR can be measured precisely. I hope they are very correct in that evaluation because my program is to set up this: Using DeBroglie book and modified, find: Electron Blackbody cavity temperature for HYDROGEN Find it for HELIUM Find it for LITHIUM Find it for BERYLLIUM ...... ........ Find it for THORIUM Find it for Element 91 Find it for URANIUM Find it for NEPTUNIUM Find it for PLUTONIUM Find it for Element 95 My hunch is that as we do the calculations that the temperatures of CMBR as related to Blackbody Electron Cavities will find that the Nature's journal figure of 2.726 plusminus 0.010 K fits plutonium best of all the chemical elements of their electron cavities. They say it is a precise number. I hope they are right because the calculations using DeBroglie formula should find that plutonium fits the number the best. Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 10:40:37 -0700 Subject: #28w why Kelvin is special; 0 K and how Kelvin defines 1 K Re: ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY REPLACES BIG BANG THEORY IN PHYSICS Kelvin has a 0 degree which is tied directly to a physics phenomenon of "no motion". However, Kelvin, and Rankine and Celcius and all the other temperature scales did not tie 1 degree to anything of physics. They simply were shoddy in thought as to not to tie Kelvin with a physics phenomenon at 1 degree They knew that 0 degree had physics relevance as "no motion" So what to tie the "KELVIN 1 DEGREE" that has physics relevance and that connects with "no motion?" So that all of Kelvin is connected and tied to physics? The answer is that blackbody cavity radiation of electrons themselves is what connects it all together. So that Kelvin Temperature Scale is not only possessing Absolute Zero but what one can call Absolute One degree kelvin, that every degree measure in Kelvin is physics-wise tied up. Using DeBroglie book on the thermodynamics of the isolated atom or isolated electron we find temperatures of the number of Coulomb Interactions inside atoms and we find that the electron itself is a blackbody cavity. So the electron as a blackbody cavity determines the 1 degree Kelvin as a Absolute 1 degree tied to the Absolute Zero Kelvin. A proton probably does not have a blackbody cavity. And a collapsed wavefunction of an electron, such as an electron moving in a copper wire in the flow of electricity does not have a blackbody cavity. Those two particles of a proton or collapsed wavefunction electron would have a zero exponent in the DeBroglie program of electron blackbody cavities and thus they would have a Kelvin temperature of 1 degree Kelvin. All the other electrons in atoms would have enormous Coulomb Interactions and thus have a blackbody cavity. Hydrogen electron in ground state would have a blackbody cavity and thus a Kelvin temperature, and somewhere near the value of e^1 and likewise, all the chemical elements from hydrogen to plutonium would have a electron blackbody cavities which have a Kelvin temperature. So, you see, Kelvin Absolute Zero was simply missing the program of relating to what is a physics meaningful Absolute One degree Kelvin so that all of Kelvin becomes a Absolute Temperature Scale and not some arbitrary scale as is Celsius and Rankine. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |