From: David Combs on 14 Dec 2009 14:18 subj: blastwave vs opencsw: can you MIX programs in /opt/csw? Note: opencsw uses pkgget (same, different from what blastwave used *before* the messy "divorce" at Blastwave between Dennis Clarke and Phillip Brown (went and started opencsw.org), whereas Clarke-and-team created "pkgutil" (pkg-util?). Now I see on opencsw that THEY have a "pkgutil" too -- plus a 2nd one, "enhanced" or "advanced" or something. Whether these various programs (pkg-get, pkgutil, -advanced) are compatible or not, I have no idea. I do know that opencsw ALSO uses /opt/csw, the SAME place Blastwave uses! So the obvious question: can I get an A from Blastwave and a B from opencsw, and not break something? More to the point, can I get an emacs-21 from Blastwave and an emacs-23 from csw? (presumably new libraries from GNU never invalidate old functions!) Sure would have been nicer (or would it?) if opencsw would have used eg /opt/opencsw instead of /opt/csw! Any discussion? Any EXPERIENCE of mixing the two software batches? THANKS! David
From: John D Groenveld on 14 Dec 2009 14:44 In article <hg6327$ee2$1(a)panix3.panix.com>, David Combs <dkcombs(a)panix.com> wrote: >So the obvious question: can I get an A from Blastwave and a B >from opencsw, and not break something? I would expect breakage. >Sure would have been nicer (or would it?) if opencsw would >have used eg /opt/opencsw instead of /opt/csw! CSW was the assigned Solaris package prefix and csw was the assigned directory for community software projects. There can be many community software projects, but a user should choose one. I know of OpenCSW.ORG and Blastwave, but I wouldn't be surprised if there weren't others for niche communities, such as governments or militaries. John groenveld(a)acm.org
From: phil.googlenews on 15 Dec 2009 12:58 On Dec 14, 11:18 am, dkco...(a)panix.com (David Combs) wrote: > > More to the point, can I get an emacs-21 from Blastwave and an > emacs-23 from csw? (presumably new libraries from GNU never > invalidate old functions!) Err.. why would you want to? (seriously, I'm presuming you have a reason, and I'd like to know the answer)
From: David Combs on 16 Dec 2009 15:03 In article <d618eac4-883b-4c4b-8e5b-6a0d169e962b(a)g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, phil.googlenews(a)bolthole.com <phil.googlenews(a)bolthole.com> wrote: >On Dec 14, 11:18�am, dkco...(a)panix.com (David Combs) wrote: >> >> More to the point, can I get an emacs-21 from Blastwave and an >> emacs-23 from csw? �(presumably new libraries from GNU never >> invalidate old functions!) > >Err.. why would you want to? > >(seriously, I'm presuming you have a reason, and I'd like to know the >answer) > Blastwave has lots of stuff, and so do you, but there's differences in versions, depending on who updated program x first. So I (and I guess most users too) would like to have some from you, and some from blastwave, depending on the versions. Makes sense to me. But do tell me ((with repetition) I am able to learn) where I'm wrong. Thanks, Phil, David
From: John D Groenveld on 16 Dec 2009 17:31 In article <hgbedv$8m$3(a)reader1.panix.com>, David Combs <dkcombs(a)panix.com> wrote: >So I (and I guess most users too) would like to have some >from you, and some from blastwave, depending on the versions. Assuming you're attempting to use CSW packages as dependencies for your SageMath builds, set up two zones: one with pkg_get pointing towards OpenCSW and another pointing towards Blastwave. John groenveld(a)acm.org
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: convert CPU load to CPU utilization in % Next: SunRay with different displays |