From: Christoph Hellwig on 6 Jul 2010 22:00 On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 11:47:18PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > We only call the functions set_device_ro(), > invalidate_bdev(), sync_filesystem() and sync_blockdev() > while holding the BKL in these commands. All > of these are also done in other code paths without > the BKL, which leads me to the conclusion that > the BKL is not needed here either. > > The reason we hold it here is that it was originally > pushed down into the ioctl function from vfs_ioctl. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: block: push BKL into blktrace ioctls Next: scsi/sd: remove big kernel lock |