Prev: A Measurement of CO2 Climate Forcing, and an estimation of it's increase.
Next: ONLY DIMWITS BELIEVE DEATH IS THE END
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 2 Aug 2010 03:19

> Now if my memory is correct, the very best that the biology community
> can come up with on
> a precision definition of Life vs. Nonlife is that it embodies four
> main aspects:
> (a) is a closed geometrical shaped object
> (b) takes in energy from outside of its body
> (c) reproduces itself
> (d) has motion
>

Now some may barge into the discussion above and say why not add an
(e) has
either DNA or RNA as the characteristics of living from nonliving.

And I would respond that I am defining life with precision over the
entire Universe, not
just here on Earth. We have no idea as to whether all planets with
life have to be DNA/RNA
based lifeforms.

So if I take this list of characteristics of life:
(a) is a closed geometrical shaped object
(b) takes in energy from outside of its body
(c) reproduces itself
(d) has motion
(e) has either DNA/RNA

That list would surely eliminate the atoms fissioning as atoms fit
a,b,c,d above except
fails to fit (e). But (e) is confined to Earth. So that one can see
that atoms are a close contender for "living" yet all of us consider
atoms as inanimate lifeless objects when
not part of a living body.

So that above list from a to e, is about the best that biology can do
for defining life versus
nonlife. The above is not precise enough and makes one consider a long
list of characteristics
that seem to fit for atoms fissioning as well as biological creatures.

So this is where my definition is superior, for it is universal and
matters not whether a planet is based on DNA/RNA or some other genetic
bases.

Life: a living object must have a brain locus.
Nonlife: a nonliving object has no brain locus.

That is my precision definition and is universal. It comes from Bell
Inequality that quantum mechanics is on the large scale and ushers in
superdeterminism. And to have superdeterminism every living object
must be directly controlled by the Atom Totality Nucleus, and that is
done via a brain-locus that forms every mind of every living object,
regardless of
whether it is DNA based or based on some other genetics.

Now I do not know what a brain-locus will be discovered as. Will it be
a small molecule?
Will its geometry be a hexagonal shaped molecule? Does lithium play a
essential part of a
brain-locus? Here I would need experts in making radios. Making a
radio out of a living body.
I would assume the brain locus is located in the brain. If it were
located in the eye, there are
many living creatures with their eyes removed that did not have a loss
of thinking or lose their mind. But when their head is cut off, no
longer does a mind exist.

I do not know what the smallest radio, made out of living tissue would
look like? Can it be a simple molecule? But perhaps it needs to be
much more than a simple molecule, considering
how much sleep is required by humans who have to sleep 1/3 of their
life to tune or focus the
brain-locus each and every day.

Now the rest of the brain which is large in comparison to the brain-
locus is merely the execution of what the brain locus has ordered up.
Much like a boss of a factory surrounded by thousands of workers all
commanded by the boss to perform tasks. So the brain locus receives
messages by photons shot by the Nucleus of the Atom Totality, and the
execution of those orders are performed by the rest of the brain
matter.

So now we can see that Nonliving objects would under superdeterminism
simply follow the laws of physics, but that Living objects need to be
more controlled by the Atom Totality and
would have a brain-locus and thus a mind.

Now I expect any day that someone in the medical profession or the
biology sciences to remove a tiny portion of a brain from some animal
to find the animal no longer can think
properly.

Now in the heyday of lobotomies, especially here in the USA, the tools
of a long rod that
scrambled around some brain matter would not have removed the brain-
locus but would have
scrambled it around so badly that it would be akin to jarring the
crystal from a radio set out of
place. And it would take a patient who was lobotomized a long time to
recover. Now I believe
the historical record of lobotomies showed a good number of patients
who seemed to have
"lost their minds completely." And in those cases, I would suspect
that the brain locus had
been moved or damaged. I do not know if anyone kept detailed records
of lobotomies.

Now I hope, sincerely, that the Brain Locus theory is not proven true
before the Atom Totality
theory is proven true. But this never occurred to me before, that I
maybe in a funny situation
that science of biology discovers the Brain Locus of animals and
proves it true, whilst still
the astronomy and physics communities not taking the Atom Totality
serious enough.

And I never thought of it that way, that if biologists prove the Brain
Locus theory true, that it would be the biologists who prove the
astronomy and physics theory of how the Universe
was made. Just think of that for a moment, where the biologists do the
job of the astronomers and physicists, for which they were derelict of
their job.

So, just think of that for a moment, that the proof of the Universe as
one big atom, is proven
by the fact that animals have radios for a mind. The ironies of
science just seem to go on
to 10^500.

Now, one more fascinating idea. What if the Brain Locus is the DNA
molecule? Then the molecule is a radio and is contained in all the
body's cells. Is a double helix acting like a
radio?

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: A Measurement of CO2 Climate Forcing, and an estimation of it's increase.
Next: ONLY DIMWITS BELIEVE DEATH IS THE END