Prev: perf bench: fix spello
Next: [-v3 PATCH 0/6] powernow-k8: Core Performance Boost and effective frequency support
From: Andrew Morton on 31 Mar 2010 16:00 On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:35:10 +0300 Vitaliy Gusev <vgusev(a)openvz.org> wrote: > acct_exit_ns --> acct_file_reopen deletes timer without > check timer execution on other CPUs. So acct_timeout() can > change an unmapped memory. > That sounds ugly. > > --- > kernel/acct.c | 17 +++++++++-------- > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/acct.c b/kernel/acct.c > index a6605ca..6ac80ca 100644 > --- a/kernel/acct.c > +++ b/kernel/acct.c > @@ -353,17 +353,18 @@ restart: > > void acct_exit_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns) > { > - struct bsd_acct_struct *acct; > + struct bsd_acct_struct *acct = ns->bacct; > > - spin_lock(&acct_lock); > - acct = ns->bacct; > - if (acct != NULL) { > - if (acct->file != NULL) > - acct_file_reopen(acct, NULL, NULL); > + if (acct == NULL) > + return; > > - kfree(acct); > - } > + del_timer_sync(&acct->timer); > + spin_lock(&acct_lock); > + if (acct->file != NULL) > + acct_file_reopen(acct, NULL, NULL); > spin_unlock(&acct_lock); > + > + kfree(acct); > } > Is this sufficient? acct_file_reopen() does a del_timer(), so acct_timeout() could be running concurrently with acct_file_reopen(), but acct_file_reopen() is merrily altering data at *acct. Perhaps acct_file_reopen() should be using del_timer_sync()? check_free_space() is doing a similar thing: del_timer(&acct->timer); acct->needcheck = 0; the currently-running timer handler now goes and sets needcheck again! Methinks the whole thing needs a bit of a rethink, bearing in mind how del_timer() actually works. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |