btrfs: report a direct-IO bug
in [Kernel]
|
Prev: [BUG] btrfs: report a direct-IO bug
Next: sched: arch_scale_freq_power (and other cpu_power / sched related questions)
From: Josef Bacik on 5 May 2010 22:00 On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 09:47:45AM +0800, liubo wrote: > When we tested the series of jim owens' direct-IO patch, a bug occured. > > It could be reproduced on a 2.6.34-rc6 kernel with > direct-IO patch by the following steps... > > # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb > # mount /dev/sdb /home/btrfsdisk > # cd /home/btrfsdisk > # create test.c > # dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=7K count=1 > # gcc test.c -o test > # ./test > I'm in the middle of re-working the DIO code. You can pull from my git tree http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-unstable-josef.git;a=summary Pull from the my-dio branch. It survives fsx, but it fails on 5 out of 7 AIO tests in xfstests, which I'm tracking down. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Maciej Rutecki on 7 May 2010 10:10
On czwartek, 6 maja 2010 o 03:47:45 liubo wrote: > When we tested the series of jim owens' direct-IO patch, a bug occured. > > It could be reproduced on a 2.6.34-rc6 kernel with > direct-IO patch by the following steps... > I created a Bugzilla entry at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15935 for your bug report, please add your address to the CC list in there, thanks! -- Maciej Rutecki http://www.maciek.unixy.pl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |