From: Victor Duchovni on 20 May 2010 18:33 On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:29:49PM +0300, Eray Aslan wrote: > Berkeley DB 5.0 is out and provides an SQlite-compatible interface. > Having an alternative to SQLite is considered a good thing and there is > some interest in bringing db-5.0 into mainstream use. Is this the default Berkeley-DB version for your system platform? If not, you should generally avoid the temptation to use a non-default Berkeley-DB. > dict_db.c:685:2: error: #error "Unsupported Berkeley DB version" Yes, the list of supported (major) versions is manually maintained. > --- a/src/util/dict_db.c > +++ b/src/util/dict_db.c > -#if (DB_VERSION_MAJOR == 4 && DB_VERSION_MINOR > 0) > +#if (DB_VERSION_MAJOR == 5) || (DB_VERSION_MAJOR == 4 && DB_VERSION_MINOR > 0) Have you read the release-notes? What are the incompatibilities with 4.x (if any)? -- Viktor. P.S. Morgan Stanley is looking for a New York City based, Senior Unix system/email administrator to architect and sustain our perimeter email environment. If you are interested, please drop me a note.
From: Eray Aslan on 21 May 2010 01:04 On 05/21/2010 01:33 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:29:49PM +0300, Eray Aslan wrote: > Is this the default Berkeley-DB version for your system platform? No > If > not, you should generally avoid the temptation to use a non-default > Berkeley-DB. I maintain some packages for Gentoo Linux. This came up while testing application compatibility with Berkeley DB 5.0. >> --- a/src/util/dict_db.c >> +++ b/src/util/dict_db.c >> -#if (DB_VERSION_MAJOR == 4 && DB_VERSION_MINOR > 0) >> +#if (DB_VERSION_MAJOR == 5) || (DB_VERSION_MAJOR == 4 && DB_VERSION_MINOR > 0) > > Have you read the release-notes? What are the incompatibilities with 4.x > (if any)? I've seen nothing major so far. http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/installation/changelog_5_0.html http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/installation/upgrade_11gr2_toc.html -- Eray
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Postfix, SASL and LDAPDB [solved] Next: quota and postfix virtual users |