canon 300D, same as DS6041 model?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Skip M on 27 Aug 2005 00:07 "Linda Nieuwenstein" <buzzball(a)REMOVETHIS-allstream.net> wrote in message news:HOEPe.106$hW.41(a)tor-nn1... > > "Skip M" wrote > My, this is fun, I think I'll wait to kill file you to > see how deep you dig >> yourself in. >> > > Stop being such a Sally. Kill file me now please instead of parading like > a peacock. > > Take care, > Linda > Nah, having too much fun. -- Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
From: Skip M on 27 Aug 2005 01:57 "Linda Nieuwenstein" <buzzball(a)REMOVETHIS-allstream.net> wrote in message news:SzEPe.101$hW.95(a)tor-nn1... > > "Skip M" wrote >> >> Well, gee, since I just quoted his release, above, maybe you should go >> back and read it, yourself. The 70-300 is meant for serious amateurs, >> and it says so, right there, in the first paragraph below the image of >> the lens... >> > > Yip, I see that now. Phil referred to the 70-200 at the top of article > covering both new lenses, so I read that to be the new 70-300. As soon as > I saw Professional and 'L' I went into nothing more than scan mode > figuring the price would be way too high for not-for-profit photography > which I'm into. > > Take care, > Linda > Good, discussion over. With such tightly printed script, it's easy to overlook something. -- Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
From: Skip M on 27 Aug 2005 01:58
"Linda Nieuwenstein" <buzzball(a)REMOVETHIS-allstream.net> wrote in message news:TBEPe.102$hW.1(a)tor-nn1... > > "Skip M" wrote >> >> You need to calm down, and read about that of which you write. > > And you need to stop repeating yourself. Hidden motives or do you just > like replying to me? > > Take care, > Linda > Well, since you kept insisting that it said something it didn't, I figured you needed it to be repeated so you'd latch on to it. You even argued the point with me, and quoted the piece back. It didn't seem like you were "listening." -- Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com |