challenge to Chandler Davis to post a valid Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof to sci.math #5.02 Correcting Math
in [Logic]
|
Prev: Meaning, Presuppositions, Truth-relevance, Godel's Theorem and
Next: what Julia F. Knight (Journal of Logic) has in common with Chandler Davis (Mathematical Intelligencer) #5.03 Correcting Math
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 8 Aug 2010 14:05 Chandler Davis (davis(a)math.toronto.edu) Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:44 PM To: Archimedes Plutonium (plutonium.archimedes(a)gmail.com) According to this email of 19July, Chandler does not believe Archimedes Plutonium has a Infinitude of Twin Primes proof. So, I challenge Chandler Davis to post to sci.math his version of a valid Euclid Infinitude of Regular Primes proof. It is very obvious that in the magazine article that Davis edited regards to Hardy/Woodgold of Fall 2009 about Euclid's proof, that the article never gives a valid Indirect proof of Euclid's IP. So one must suspect and consider that neither Davis, nor Hardy nor Woodgold are capable of a valid Euclid Indirect Infinitude of Primes proof. If the history of Euclid's IP is just now beginning to realize that Euclid did a Direct (constructive) proof and not a Indirect (contradiction proof). That it makes sense that neither Davis nor Hardy nor Woodgold could even do a valid Euclid IP indirect, since they have just learned that Euclid's IP was direct all along. So, Mr. Chandler Davis, please post your Euclid Indirect IP to sci.math. I included you in the cc. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |