From: Geoffrey Clements on 24 Nov 2008 04:03 "Geoffrey Clements" <bitbucket(a)electron.me.uk> wrote in message news:4926d8e6$0$502$5a6aecb4(a)news.aaisp.net.uk... > AJH wrote: > >> Or is it possible to simply adopt the old /home folder on sda1 and >> continue using it? >> > > Yes. If you only had one user, that user will be recreated with the same > UID > (probably 1000). But if not, the fix is only one chmod away. > ooops - I meant chown of course! -- Geoff
From: Nix on 25 Nov 2008 18:57 On 24 Nov 2008, Geoffrey Clements said: > "Geoffrey Clements" <bitbucket(a)electron.me.uk> wrote in message > news:4926d8e6$0$502$5a6aecb4(a)news.aaisp.net.uk... >> Yes. If you only had one user, that user will be recreated with the same >> UID >> (probably 1000). But if not, the fix is only one chmod away. > > ooops - I meant chown of course! So I'm not the only person who makes this mistake all the time? (I mix up chcon with the other two, too.) -- `Not even vi uses vi key bindings for its command line.' --- PdS
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Live CD able to mount NTFS partitions read/write Next: Cygwin & serial terminals |