Prev: Norm in Sobolev Space
Next: Introduction to Cartesian Coordinates and Straight Lines
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 23 Dec 2009 23:05


Yes, I am saying that the number of true subshells and shells is not
a 22/7 ratio but is transcendental

I can sharpen that up for you quite a bit. And it shows how poorly
mathematicians have done their job of explaining the difference
between "transcendental and algebraic". When I went to College
the definition of transcendental became: "not algebraic". In
mathematics,
the science of precision, is a poor science when its definitions
between
algebraic and transcendental are such that one is dependent on the
other-- "not algebraic = transcendental".

It is not the first time that mathematicians were unable to clearly
define
one of their own concepts and where a physicist stepped into the
environment and well-defined a concept of mathematics by using
physics. It has happened before, such as the concept of
Superdeterminism
well defining the Bell Inequality mathematics.

But let me sharpen this entire chapter up.

In physics, unlike mathematics, we have a concept of Collapsed
Wavefunction
and Uncollapsed Wavefunction. An algebraic number for mathematics
comes
from a Collapsed Wavefunction in physics. A transcendental number in
mathematics comes from a Uncollapsed Wavefunction.

Example: an electron can be a integral unit as one ball when collapsed
wavefunction
and moving in a copper wire in electricity. But an electron can also
be an infinite
number of dots of an electron-dot-cloud spread over the distance of
infinity which
is the Uncollapsed Wavefunction.

So we begin to see the true difference between Algebraic number and
Transcendental
number. In that a Algebraic Number is **fixed** of all of its digits
such as 1/3
is 0.33333........ where all of its digits are "3" and is not
dependent on time.
But a transcendental number like (pi) is **growing** and dependent on
time. Where
no intelligent lifeform can tell you all of its digits. I can tell you
all of the digits of
1/3 and I can tell you all of the digits of any algebraic number due
to a algebraic formula
that computes all of the digits no matter at what time in the Cosmos
we are living
and setting a computer to spew out the nth digit.

But a transcendental number like (pi) or (e) are not fixed and are
growing and changing.
So that we are never able to spew out every nth digit of pi but must
rely on **time
and environment of the Cosmos** to get at the far off nth digit.

To be Transcendental means that intelligent life is limited to an nth
digit related to
time of the Cosmos in which they are determining the nth digit. To be
Algebraic
there is no time constraint on telling someone the "nth digit" of that
number.

If humanity had been borne in a Helium Atom Totality instead of a
Plutonium Atom
Totality, then the digits for pi would have been closer to 1/1 than
22/7. In the next
Future-Atom Totality of 23 subshells instead of 22 subshells, the
advanced life
measuring and using "pi" will peg pi at 23/7, far larger than our
"pi" of today.

This concept of a number being fixed or growing is hard and difficult
for the
mathematics community for they have a hard time of understanding that
mathematics
itself is "time dependent" and not "time independent". Mathematicians
have assumed
and believed up to 1990s before the Atom Totality theory that
mathematics is
universal and not dependent on time. That was a false assumption. The
fundamental
difference between algebraic and transcendental is the issue of time
dependency.
Pi and (e) are numbers whose value is not fixed but growing whereas
algebraic
numbers are all fixed. But in a new atom totality of the future, all
the numbers change
even the Algebraic numbers we know of now such as 1/3. So I cannot say
that
a number like 1/3 is fixed forever. When the value of pi changes
drastically in a future
Atom Totality then all the numbers, including Algebraic Numbers change
in value.

One has to keep in mind that a future-Atom Totality changes geometry
drastically
and so both the algebraic and transcendental numbers of the future
have to change
to harmonize with the changed geometry.

Also, I should remark that the present ideas that the transcendental
numbers are not
of the same order of infinity as the algebraic numbers is a fake idea
of current
and present math community. It is likely that there are only two
transcendental numbers
in all of existence and that all the transcendental numbers are
equinumerous with the
algebraic numbers. So that all transcendental numbers are merely
scalars of pi and
e.

That pi was a different number some 20 billion years ago and not the
same number
that pi is today.

The Big Bang theory could never step into a environment of mathematics
and tell
the mathematicians the meaning of (pi) of (e) and correct their poor
and lousy
definitions and understanding of algebraic versus transcendental. The
Big Bang
took a back seat to mathematics and was assuming that mathematics is
more
powerful than physics and where physics takes its meaning from
mathematics.

The Atom Totality theory puts physics and math in proper place.
Physics determines
mathematics and Physics is the King of science and mathematics is a
small
tiny subset of physics.

One of the implications of a growing (pi) that fits and matches the
Atom
Totality of a specific time is that "pi" and "e" can increase or
decrease
in value
from one Cosmos to another Cosmos. That the value of pi in a Lead or
Thorium
or Plutonium or Element 96 Atom Totality is not a assured increase in
value
but where pi can decrease in a future Atom Totality. As the Chemical
Elements
go up in atomic number, does not automatically mean the value of (pi)
and
(e) goes up incrementally, but rather, has periods of time where the
value decreases
from previous Cosmos. This would correspond to redshifts and
blueshifts in galaxies.

Summary: so the idea that (pi) is a growing number and not fixed gives
it the meaning
of transcendental number and also that (pi) value can both increase
or
decrease in one Cosmic Period. As the Future-Atom Totality may have
either
and increase in the value of pi or a decrease in the value of pi
depending on whether
the subshells goes from 22 to 23 or 24 or 25 or 26 and whether the
shells goes
from 7 to 8 or 9. So there are episodes where the Atom Totality has a
decrease
in value of pi.

Now I wonder if such episodes leave a Cosmic Fossil?? Sort of like a
tree
ring pattern. Perhaps the Cosmic Microwave Radiation has left behind a
imprint
of when "pi" was of different values.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Norm in Sobolev Space
Next: Introduction to Cartesian Coordinates and Straight Lines