Prev: Constancy of the velocity of light
Next: Quantum Gravity 351.5: E(X-->Y) and Inverse Laplace Transform Similarities
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 31 Dec 2009 02:02 Let me list some questions that bother me about the Atom Totality theory, when considered as the true theory of physics. Of course I have never doubted the theory since discovery in 1990, but with every science discovery the questioning never closes or ends, for there is always more questions on the horizon. (1) I do not know how many new atom totalities will the future unfold. Does the succession go to infinity? Or does the element-succession of the Atom Totality end at some element such as element 114 and then the Atom Totality starts over again with a Hydrogen then Helium Atom Totality? (2) I have a large question about the role of Duality in physics. It seems to be the predominant mechanism of physics. It seems to be at the heart or center of what is called the quantum mystery. It seems to be the existence mechanism. That existence would not be here if not for a dualism. So that existence is dualism. The most basic dualism is particle to wave. So this seems to be the heart of physics-- duality. And maybe no human mind can ever probe deeper into this mechanism of duality. Duality is even deeper than Logic, so that logic is several levels further removed but that duality is at the bottom floor. Oddly enough, literature has touched on duality in Hamlet-- to be or not to be, that is the question. Maybe I am making a big mistake with duality as a mechanism. Maybe I should focus more on "atoms" and consider duality as a characteristic of atoms. Maybe "atoms" are at the bottom floor and that duality is a floor above and Logic several floors above. So of these two questions, one is that of cycling. How far out does the Atom Totality go? And the other question is the bottom floor foundation of Atom Totality. Perhaps the mind of a living creature inside a Atom Totality was never meant to learn or understand the Cosmic process. Perhaps the mind of a living creature was only designed to nucleosynthesize the elements beyond plutonium in order to create the next Atom Totality and that our minds are never capable of understanding what the "atoms know," nor is there a need for living creatures to understand what the atoms work in full. Akin to literature where people ask who created god or how does god work. Maybe, living creatures should be satisfied with understanding what the Universe is-- a big atom. And the role that living creatures play-- nucleosynthesize the elements beyond plutonium. So maybe we should be satisfied in knowing what the Universe is and where it is going. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |