Prev: superellipse perimeter formula-
Next: Kind of Godel numbering
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 20 Dec 2009 21:43

From: Archimedes Plutonium
Newsgroups: sci.physics.particle,sci.physics,sci.astro
Subject: Gamma-ray bursts; hypernova?
Date: 15 May 1998 03:53:27 GMT

Such was the title of 7May NATURE. In an Atom Totality
theory, the size
and quantity of a particle or its energy can be of the
size of the
entire observable universe itself, because the
observable universe is
merely the 5f6, the space and mass of the last 6
electrons of 231Pu.
Other theories of the universe are bewildered by
cosmic ray particles
of 10^19 MeV or gamma-ray bursts of 10^53 erg.

In an Atom Totality, a cosmic ray particle of
10^1000 MeV can show up
or a gamma-ray burst of 10^1000 erg can appear. These
energetic
particles are travellers from the nucleus of 231Pu. If
one of the alpha
particles of the Atom Totality itself appeared in our
5f6, it could
have more energy than our entire observable universe
itself.

The appearance of these energetic particles is
nothing to be
frightened of. Sure a particle from the nucleus of
231Pu could snuff
out the entire observable universe, but none will.
These appearances
are common daily events and is the means for which our
universe is
growing. The Plutonium Atom Totality will someday in
the far future
grow into the next Atom Totality of Element 96, but in
the meantime,
these energetic particle appearances are growth to our
universe. It is
what Dirac was referring to in his classic book
DIRECTIONS IN PHYSICS
and which I call RSNM for radioactive spontaneous
neutron/alpha
particle/proton/beta particle materialization (RSNM).

To fake theories of physics such as Big-Bang and
Steady-State, these
energetic particles are conundrums and puzzles.

--- quoting in parts NATURE, 7MAY98, p 13 ---

The burst, the burster and its lair

An analysis of the light from a gamma-ray burst shows
that it occurred
in a very distant galaxy. This confirms that bursts
are by far the most
powerful bombs in nature's arsenal, and only the most
copious known
energy source can explain them.

In 1969, two satellites were launched to watch for
covert nuclear
weapons tests. Instead, they detected occasional
flashes of gamma-rays,
coming from apparently random directions in space.
Since then, the
origin of these gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been
among the greatest
problems in astrophysics.
....
But gamma-ray-burst research has been revolutionized
since the frist
discovery of an optical afterglow, last year. The
BeppoSAX satellite,
.....the optical spectrum of GRB970228 had a redshift
of at least 0.835
....
But a burst seen on 14 December 1997 has told us
even more. Three
papers in this issue describe how GRB971214 occurred
at an enormous
redshift of 3.42
.....
....who calculate from the high redshift that the burst
emitted 3 x
10^53 erg in gamma-rays alone. This is around 20% of
the rest-mass
energy of the Sun, or 50 times as much as the Sun will
radiate in its
lifetime.
--- end quoting in parts NATURE, 7MAY98, p 13 ---

--------
Subject: Dirac's new radioactivity is cosmic rays and
gamma rays
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Date: 1998/03/15
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion,sci.geo.geology

The high energy cosmic rays (protons) some of 10^20
MeV have been
observed. Cosmic gamma ray bursts are uniform
throughout the cosmos.

Both cosmic rays and cosmic gamma rays are uniform.
(snipped)

--- quoting in parts DIRECTIONS IN PHYSICS, P.A.M.
Dirac, pages 76-78
---
Now, according to the Large Number Hypothesis, all
these very large
dimensionless numbers should be connected together. We
should then
expect that (total mass)/(proton mass) = 10^78
proportional to t^2.
..
..
Using the same argument again, we are therefore led to
think that the
total number of protons in the Universe is increasing
proportionally to
t^2. Thus, there must be creation of matter in the
Universe, a
continuous creation of matter.
..
..

I propose a theory where there is continuous
creation of matter,
together with this variation of G. Both the assumption
of continuous
creation and the variation of G follow from the Large
Numbers
Hypothesis.
This continuous creation of matter must be looked
upon as something
quite independent of known physical processes.
According to the
ordinary physical processes, which we study in the
laboratory, matter
is conserved. Here we have direct nonconservation of
matter. It is, if
you like, a new kind of radioactive process for which
there is
nonconservation of matter and by which particles are
created where they
did not previously exist.
..
..
One is that the new matter is continually
created
throughout the whole of space, and in that case, it is
mostly created
in intergalactic space. I call this the assumption of
additive
creations. Alternatively, one might make the
assumption that new matter
is created close by where matter already exists. That
newly created
matter is of the same atomic nature as the matter
already existing
there. This would mean that all atoms are just
multiplying up. I call
that the assumption of multiplicative creation. There
are these two
possibilities for the creation of new matter. I do not
know which to
prefer. One should continue with both possibilities
and examine their
consequences.

--- end quoting in parts DIRECTIONS IN PHYSICS, P.A.M.
Dirac, pages
76-78 ---


What is the largest energy proton (cosmic ray)
particle ever recorded?
The reason I ask is because record breaking newer
higher energetic
protons are discovered every year and the previous
record is broken.
Has the most energetic proton been observed at 10^20
MeV?

RSNM is short for Radioactive Spontaneous
Neutron/Proton/Alpha-particle/Beta-particle/photon/neutrino
Materialization.

RSNM is the means by which the universe grows, in
matter and energy.
Our galaxy and solar system grew from RSNM and cosmic
rays are the most
dramatic examples of RSNM.

So where does RSNM come from? Easy answer: RSNM
(cosmic ray protons)
come from the nucleus of 231Pu. Our space and the
matter we observe as
galaxies is but the last six electrons of 231Pu. These
last six
electrons are called the 5f6. So when the nucleus of
231Pu emits a
particle it can settle in the 5f6 and it can have
almost infinite
amount of energy. Keep in mind that our observable
universe is but six
electrons and a proton emitted from the nucleus of the
231Pu Atom
Totality can have more energy than the entire energy
of the 94th
electron of 5f6.

Dirac's new radioactivity as he outlines in his book
is RSNM and it
is at work daily in the observable universe. Cosmic
ray protons are
this new radioactivity and it seems to be uniform
throughout the
observable universe.

Whether the observable universe is additive-up or
multiplying-up, a
question that Dirac proposed in his book, I cannot
tell at this time. I
would need to research this question of Dirac. I
suppose I can find
some link with the observed cosmic ray protons, and
that 5f6 of plutonium.
------

So, the Nucleus of the Atom Totality is computing whereever
and whenever an atom of say technetium or promethium
or uranium is to occur and where it is to take place. Whether
those atoms or any other chemical element is formed from
star nucleosynthesis or through supernova or through a
cosmic ray burst.

A major problem of the Big Bang and Nebular Dust Cloud theories
is that they cannot provide enough dust clouds to make all those
stars in the brief amount of time of the Big Bang of 13 to 14
billions of years, nor provide enough supernovas to uniformily
distribute the
elements within that 13 to 14 billion years for supernova are rare
events
but the uniformity of the elements is remarkably uniform.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: superellipse perimeter formula-
Next: Kind of Godel numbering