classical benzene model
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Moving backword
Next: Chapt21: meaning and purpose of life Re: Exoplanets in Tight 2:1 Resonance #252 & 4.36 Atom Totality & Correcting Math
From: Sam Wormley on 2 Aug 2010 08:24 On 8/2/10 1:38 AM, john wrote: > If they can tell you, > "Dark Matter", and you believe it, > more power to them. A skeptic would look up the evidence for dark matter compiled for more than half a century. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
From: PD on 2 Aug 2010 12:23 On Aug 1, 1:35 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > On Aug 1, 11:26 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > john wrote: > > > No-one has yet modelled > > > Benzene with actual pathways. > > > > I tried before and failed. > > > > I am going to try again, but I warn you, > > > I have already seen in my mind that > > > it works. > > > > How much credence for the galaxy > > > model would I accrue if I do it? > > > None, unless you could possibly predict something observable that has > > been overlooked by already existing models. > > The prediction would be that delocallized > electrons is another hocus-pocus > fantasy of the QM charlatans, I suppose. > john That's not an observable prediction, John. Do you know what "observable prediction" means?
From: john on 2 Aug 2010 13:26 On Aug 2, 6:24 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/2/10 1:38 AM, john wrote: > > > If they can tell you, > > "Dark Matter", and you believe it, > > more power to them. > > A skeptic would look up the evidence for dark matter compiled for > more than half a century. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter Dark matter is invisible. So were the emperor's clothes. This is not science, Sam, this is bullshit. QM is strange and wonderful and so are pipe-dreams. Look around at the health of our people and of our world. What a mess. Good going, 'scientists', beaches awash with oil, roads slick with roadkill, and sidewalks full of walkers and wheelchairs. Fuckin-A, guys. john
From: Sam Wormley on 2 Aug 2010 15:34 On 8/2/10 12:26 PM, john wrote: > On Aug 2, 6:24 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 8/2/10 1:38 AM, john wrote: >> >>> If they can tell you, >>> "Dark Matter", and you believe it, >>> more power to them. >> >> A skeptic would look up the evidence for dark matter compiled for >> more than half a century. >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter > > > Dark matter is invisible. So is oxygen. > > So were the emperor's clothes. Gravitational influence at galactic and galactic clusters is documented and mapped. > > This is not science, Sam, this > is bullshit. bullshit smell more like stuff you post. > > QM is strange and wonderful and > so are pipe-dreams. Quantum Electrodynamics is the most successful scientific theory ever devised. It has unprecedented accuracy. Look around at > the health of our people and of our > world. > > What a mess. It is certainly a mess in your mind, John, as you lack background to understand modern physics. > > Good going, 'scientists', beaches awash > with oil, roads slick with roadkill, and > sidewalks full of walkers and > wheelchairs. > > Fuckin-A, guys. > > john
From: Igor on 2 Aug 2010 15:48
john wrote: > On Aug 1, 11:26 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > john wrote: > > > No-one has yet modelled > > > Benzene with actual pathways. > > > > > I tried before and failed. > > > > > I am going to try again, but I warn you, > > > I have already seen in my mind that > > > it works. > > > > > How much credence for the galaxy > > > model would I accrue if I do it? > > > > None, unless you could possibly predict something observable that has > > been overlooked by already existing models. > > The prediction would be that delocallized > electrons is another hocus-pocus > fantasy of the QM charlatans, I suppose. > john I said a prediction of something observable. You are one scientifically challenged individual. |