could the Eclipsing-Test require the accuracy of the Hubble Space Telescope? Chapt10, Fiberglass Experiment #97; ATOM TOTALITY
in [Math]
|
Prev: is the P-P and P-I in 3rd layer refraction double images? Chapt11, galactic distribution #96; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Algorithm for Twin Primes?
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 19 May 2010 09:51 Perhaps on the issue of the Eclipse Testing to see if a distance astro body is moving towards or away from Earth, that I have been too harsh on the astronomy community? Because maybe this Eclipse Test could not have been done before 2010. That we had no sophisticated equipement such as the Hubble Space Telescope in place to undertake such an exacting test and measure. Mind you, the test requires a tiny bit of a total eclipse of a quasar, then wait a month or year or more and re-do the same test on the same quasar to see if the quasar breached or did not breach the previous eclipse. Maybe we never had that sort of precision before 2010. Maybe we still do not have that precision now. But I was not harsh enough on the astronomy community for reporting 4 and nearly 5 billion light year away supernova in Bootes and Coma Berenices. This defies logic in that it is indubitable that a supernova explosion is a coming towards Earth and if you couple that with a Doppler redshift, means the entire scheme of a distance related to Doppler redshift falls apart in contradiction. All supernova explosions disprove that Doppler redshift is linked to distance. I guess by the time that these two supernova were dealt with by the astronomy community, the Doppler redshift fakery had so vastly infiltrated and decayed the community into false distance reporting that even a supernova explosion was swept up into that net of falsehoods. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
From: Craig Markwardt on 19 May 2010 21:42
On May 19, 9:51 am, Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Perhaps on the issue of the Eclipse Testing to see if a distance astro > body is moving > towards or away from Earth, that I have been too harsh on the > astronomy community? > Because maybe this Eclipse Test could not have been done before 2010. > That we > had no sophisticated equipement such as the Hubble Space Telescope in > place to > undertake such an exacting test and measure. Or, maybe such tests exist but you didn't find them. Possible examples: * spectroscopic binaries (which have both redshift and blueshift) * *eclipsing* spectroscopic binaries * binary pulsars which show redshift & blueshift, also time delay due to light travel time changes throughout the orbit * *eclipsing* binary pulsars * galactic rotation curves measured at hydrogen 21 cm line (both redshift and blueshift) These are searchable by Google and ADS. All of these are quite high precision. All of them show both redshift and blueshift. Some of them show eclipses. CM |