From: Jesse F. Hughes on
Ronald Bruck <bruck(a)math.usc.edu> writes:

> If one wishes to patent a number--some have actually done this[...]

Er, can you give a few details?

--
One these mornings gonna wake | Ain't nobody's doggone business how
up crazy, | my baby treats me,
Gonna grab my gun, kill my baby. | Nobody's business but mine.
Nobody's business but mine. | -- Mississippi John Hurt
From: Ronald Bruck on
In article <874oi1w180.fsf(a)phiwumbda.org>, Jesse F. Hughes
<jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote:

> Ronald Bruck <bruck(a)math.usc.edu> writes:
>
> > If one wishes to patent a number--some have actually done this[...]
>
> Er, can you give a few details?

Well, there's this article:

<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/11/26/first_integer_patented/>

But I note that in "other stories" cited on the same page, it is
reported that a man in England ("of no stable address") was convicted
of sodomy with a donkey and a horse. Oh, those English!

The article is certainly tongue-in-cheek. In another article they
quote (concerning a lawsuit supposedly filed against the company which
patented the first integer), "The rumour, which started in the Usenet
newsgroup sci.math.research but rapidly spread to
rec.pets.cats.anecdotes, states that the 'Wron number and two other
'large' integers together ganged up on an unwilling smaller (but
technically oversize) integer and forced it to indulged in a Fermatic
practices with them".

I doubt that the US patent office would allow such patents. But then,
I doubted that they would permit patents of parts of the human genome.
My, but we live in interesting times.

-- Ron Bruck
From: cbrown on
On May 21, 11:37 am, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote:
> Ronald Bruck <br...(a)math.usc.edu> writes:
> > If one wishes to patent a number--some have actually done this[...]
>
> Er, can you give a few details?

Perhaps something like this fits the bill...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_prime

Cheers - Chas