Prev: [132/165] ext4: Make fsync sync new parent directories in no-journal mode
Next: [129/165] ext4: restart ext4_ext_remove_space() after transaction restart
From: Jesper Nilsson on 30 Jul 2010 13:30 On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:18:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > All these files use the big kernel lock in a trivial > way to serialize their private file operations, > typically resulting from an earlier semi-automatic > pushdown from VFS. > > None of these drivers appears to want to lock against > other code, and they all use the BKL as the top-level > lock in their file operations, meaning that there > is no lock-order inversion problem. > > Consequently, we can remove the BKL completely, > replacing it with a per-file mutex in every case. > Using a scripted approach means we can avoid > typos. Thanks, added to the cris-tree. /^JN - Jesper Nilsson -- Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson(a)axis.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |