From: Joshua Tolley on 15 Jul 2010 09:39 On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:04:21PM +0200, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote: > hello ... > > a view is already nice but i think it is still too narrow. > the problem is: you don't want a view for every potential join. > in addition to that - ideally there is not much left of a view when it comes to checking for costs. > so, i think, this is not the kind of approach leading to total success here. The prolem is a very big one, and it's helpful to try solving it one piece at a time, so the single table and view-based cases are probably good starting points. > one side question: does anybody happen to know how this is one in oracle or db2? Neither appear to handle multi-column statistics in any form. [1] http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B13789_01/appdev.101/b10802/d_stats.htm [2] http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/data/library/techarticle/dm-0606fechner/index.html -- Joshua Tolley / eggyknap End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: [HACKERS] cross column correlation revisted Next: five-key syscaches |