Prev: P= /V:P == 2P*V because fist '/V' is actually '/' divided by 'V'comp.language.python.brood of vipers! Look! I got it, Gus! I got it! Look: P= /V:P == 2P*V because fist '/V' is actually '/' divided by 'V'
Next: solutions of a particular equation
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 23 Jun 2010 03:09
Let me frame the derivation with this paragraph example. I like it
when I reach a
moment in which a paragraph describes the entire idea to a new reader.
Describe
the derivation and how it works.

--- derivation of speed of light out of pure math ---
 Earlier I wrote how the speed of light in physics should be derived
 out of pure math
 as that of Stripe Geometry on the surface of Earth where I take all
 the meridians
 as stripes and where the circumference of Earth is 40,000 km so all
 the stripes are
 1 km wide and all of meridians distance would be 40,000 x 40,000 and
the
stripe
 that represents
 the Log-spiral would be 5,000 and this is the time in seconds
instead of distance,
thus yielding a speed of light
40,000 x 40,000 / 5,000 is equal to 3 x
 10^5 km/sec.
--- end of derivation ---

Now the above derivation is unitless, in other words it matters not
whether we do in
in km/second or meters/second or in miles/second because the band
width of the
stripe compensates for the different units.

Now there are still some unresolved issues I have with the technique.
For instance,
I am not resolved on why it is 1/8 of the circumference as a log-
spiral representation, that is involved. This maybe because
in a Plutonium Atom Totality, the geometry of plutonium as seen on
page 73 of "The
Elements Beyond Uranium" by Seaborg and Loveland, 1990, shows 8 lobes
of the
plutonium atom geometry. Or it maybe the case as a poster responded to
what is
the maximum size triangle that can be converted from Elliptic into
Hyperbolic geometry
and vice versa which involves 1/8 circumference. Or maybe these two
are related.

But regardless of whether I have some ironing out to do, is no
detraction for the technique.
The technique is solid. The technique is here to stay and to elaborate
upon.

And it may shock most everyone in physics that the speed of light can
be churned
out from pure mathematics.

Now that leaves open for a complaint. A complaint I recently received
saying that
Mr. Plutonium, if you had not known that the speed of light is roughly
3 x 10^5 km/s
then you would not know to take 1/8 of the circumference as
representative log-spiral. Now that is of course a very valid
complaint.

So instead of answering that complaint directly, let me veer off as to
the meaning
of the technique. And once I finish with the "meaning of the
technique". I think I can
answer the complaint better.

I previously wrote that the speed of light has alot in common with the
absolute
zero kelvin temperature of physics. Both are limits, one an upper
limit and the other
a lower limit. Both are never reached in physics and we see that
especially with
0 Kelvin. But with the speed of light, it is never actually reached
either because
there is no perfect vacuum in physics, and there is no Euclidean
geometry in
physics for light to travel at the speed of light, but always at a
slower speed,
just as light is slowed down travelling through water.

So let me offer my opinion as to what this new technique is all about
for the
speed of light.

There are three geometries in the Universe, -- Euclidean, Elliptic and
Hyperbolic.
To me, Euclidean when broken in its symmetry ends up being Elliptic
and Hyperbolic
where one is the picture and the other is the frame for the picture.
In other words,
Euclidean geometry exists because it is a compilation of Elliptic with
Hyperbolic.
Elliptic is like the particle and Hyperbolic the wave. So the two
geometries
are duals of one another, like particle and wave duality.

So Quantum Mechanics is Elliptic and Hyperbolic geometry. Now when I
say the 0 Kelvin
is a lower limit and nothing can ever reach 0 Kelvin, then it is not
physical is it? It is not
obtainable so it does not exist, does it, but rather, it is a
condition or a lower limit. Likewise
for the speed of light as an upper limit. It can never be reality
because there is no
perfect vacuum and Space is not Euclidean but rather Elliptic with
Hyperbolic.

In a sense, then, Euclidean geometry is the limit of putting Elliptic
with Hyperbolic geometry
together as one geometry.
What I mean here is that if you have a concave inward triangle
(hyperbolic) and added
a concave outward triangle (elliptic) they cancel and produce a
straight lined Euclidean triangle. So the speed of light, is a limit
of Elliptic speeds. That you can go as fast as you
want until you reach almost the speed of light and still be Elliptic
geometry, but if you
reach the speed of light, you entered into Euclidean geometry.

Any and every sphere has lines of longitude and a log spiral to the
poles that is
a 1/8 circumference representative. Any and every
sphere has band-meridians or stripe-meridians. We ask the question,
what is the Minimum
speed at which you can cover that sphere of its band-meridians and log
spiral? And the answer
is that the Least speed or lower limit speed to cover or create the
sphere surface itself, is the
40,000 x 40,000 / 5,000.

So the speed of light, is seen as a creation process of making the
sphere itself in the least amount of speed.

So now, to answer the valid question raised that "Mr. Plutonium, you
had to know the speed of
light before you used your purely math derivation?"

And my reply back is that "no". If I never heard of 3 x 10^5 km/s. And
armed only with my
above technique. I would have looked at Earth as a sphere and said,
alright, I want a speed of
light in km/s. That meant I would have had 40,000 km band
circumference and I would have had 40,000 of these bands. So that
would have given me a total distanced of 1,600,000,000
km. Then I would have had to have known beforehand that 1/8 of the
circumference was the
Minimum for the log spiral as a time, not distance measure, admittely,
knowing it was
1/8 the circumference that is the Minimum needed speed. And the log
spiral would have given
me 1/8 of 40,000 but not in km but in seconds, so I would have had
5,000 seconds from the
log spiral.

So the answer to the valid complaint, is that I needed to know that
1/8 circumference for
the log spiral was the Minimum, and that I never needed to know that
the speed of light was 3 x 10^5 km/s beforehand.

Faraday and Maxwell described light as the disturbance of the EM
field. What I am doing
with the technique is describing light as a creator of a particle or
sphere, or a creator of a
sphere geometry. Light travels through every band meridian in the time
of 1/8 circumference as log spiral, is
a light wave that is creating that sphere itself.

Another way of saying it, is that a sphere exists in mathematics,
because the Minimum
speed to traverse all the meridian bands divided by 1/8 circumference
as log spiral is the speed of light. If that
were not true, then there would be no spheres in Euclidean geometry.

Again, Faraday and Maxwell saw light as a disturbance of the EM field.
I am beginning to
see light as a creator of a sphere. So that when we hold a magnet
under a sheet of
paper with iron filings, they quickly form into a circular
configuration. That the EM waves
are forming a 2D sphere or circle and in 3D would be a sphere.

P.S. as for proof that the speed of light is actually the digits of pi
to an exponent is
straightforward from the fact that most of the lengths in physics of
the smallest lengths
are digits of the golden ratio 1.618.. Because the smallest lengths in
physics have a
golden ratio digits such as Planck length, proton diameter, elementary
charge, means
that the speed of light is the digits of pi to an exponent.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: P= /V:P == 2P*V because fist '/V' is actually '/' divided by 'V'comp.language.python.brood of vipers! Look! I got it, Gus! I got it! Look: P= /V:P == 2P*V because fist '/V' is actually '/' divided by 'V'
Next: solutions of a particular equation