Prev: tensor inverse ?
Next: for x,y > 7 twins(x+y) <= twins(x) + twins(y)
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 14 Apr 2010 16:13
As promised, I am going to leave this book today. I did get my taxes
computed
and they sort of slowed me down in the last month. But in a few days I
will start the
latest edition of the Plutonium Atom Totality theory and I will also
do the geology book
that replaces the plate tectonic theory with that of a more truthful
theory of why
continents drift. They drift more because of the EM force in the
rattling of the layers
of Earth closest to the surface rather than a heat convection
mechanism. The analog
here is the top of a refrigerator with a heavy pan up there that
slowly through time
the electric motor rattles the pan with vibrations that moves it.

Anyway, I am here at the end of this book in math. It is my best
written math book
and I do not know when, if ever, I have the time to write another math
book. And
this math book starts a new trend in writing all math books of the
future. The trend
is quite obvious that there is as much physics in this book as there
is mathematics
and that is what really should be in all math books. The constant
referral of whatever
mathematics appears in a book to that of experimental physics and pure
physics
makes for a good math book. If a math book does not refer to physics,
then it is
mostly a muddle headed ego trip by the author. And these books are
more likely to
be fake-math than have any truth content.

Now let me give an example of how a math book should treat a subject
matter.
Earlier I wrote how the speed of light in physics should be derived
out of pure math
as that of Stripe Geometry on the surface of Earth where I take all
the meridians
as stripes and where the circumference of Earth is 40,000 km so all
the stripes are
1 km wide and all of meridians would be 40,000 x 40,000 and the stripe
that represents
the Log-spiral would be 5,000, thus yielding a speed of light of 3 x
10^5 km/sec.

So no matter what the units are, the stripe width accomodates those
units and it is
because of geometry, of Elliptic versus Hyperbolic that the speed of
light is a constant.

And for the volume example, which I did not complete, the stripes on
the surface of
Earth would be 40,000 x 40,000 but the stripes would be hoses for the
interior volume
of a km diameter hoses and how many of them to pack the interior
volume? So this
may look more like experimental physics than it does mathematics. But
the point
I want to bring across is that if one goes to a math library at
Harvard, or MIT or
Princeton or Stanford and looks through each math book, and burns all
those
books that do not refer to Physics, but rather is a ego trip by the
author, well, I
suspect that 99% of the books on mathematics are ready for the burn
pile or
junk pile, for they were ego trips, not mathematics.

The trouble with old-math is that they seldom had **precision
definitions** as this
book shows that they never even defined Finite versus Infinite and why
they
then never were able to solve Perfect Numbers Conjecture, Goldbach,
Fermat's
Last, Riemann Hypothesis, etc etc.

When you demand that math refer to physics, you ground math into more
solid
definitions. You force the mathematician to go outside his ivory tower
nonsense
of make belief imagination. You force him to precision define what is
Finite Number.

And this should be the case for all math books to have a large amount
of referal
to physics, not just to make better precision but rather, because
Physics is above
mathematics. That Physics is the supreme science and that math is only
a tiny
subset of physics. Numbers come from Physics because atoms are
numerous
and so the atoms give birth or give rise to Number theory. And because
atoms
have various shapes, gives birth or rise to a subject called Geometry.
The numbers
"pi and e" in mathematics are created by Physics in that the Atom
Totality has
22 subshells in 7 shells where only 19 subshells are occupied, thus
22/7 and
19/7. Which gives rise to Fine-Structure Constant 22/ (22/7)^7. So
here we see
that the mathematician is only a specialized physicist.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: tensor inverse ?
Next: for x,y > 7 twins(x+y) <= twins(x) + twins(y)