Prev: Why choose SolidWorks 3D CAD for Mechanical product design & drawings?
Next: Feldman
From: ferruccio levi on 25 Jun 2010 04:43
Many thanks for the answer, which apparently confirms that adding and
suppressing is the only way.

Now perhaps I'll have some problems with mates, since other parts of the
model should mate to these varying parts; I hope SW will accept and ignore
any mate to a suppressed part, but I've not yet tried it.

Ferruccio Levi



"Jean-Marc" <jmb(a)world.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:4c244da4$0$8300$426a34cc(a)news.free.fr...
>
> "ferruccio levi" <ferruccio.levi(a)viaarchimede.it> a �crit dans le message
>>
>> My problem should be much simpler: I do not need two configurations for
>> PART 1 or PART 2: they are two quite different things; in my example two
>> SKF bearings, built as subasseblies by VBA routines provided directly by
>> SKF, on which I've not any control facility.
>>
>> Each dimension of the model require its own bearing type and size; really
>> the only way is to incorporate ALL the possible bearings in the main
>> assembly, to be suppressed all but one in the design table ?
>>
>> Ferruccio Levi
>
> I am not using design table much anymore. Except in special situations.
>
> Usualy, I create a new configuration (right click in the configuration
> tab/ create a new config, same as part config). Then I add/ supress (not
> erase) the parts as I need.
>
> You should try that way, on a test assembly.
>
> Then you can do an insert/ table/ design table. And let the system create
> the excel file. You can then examine this table to see how you can do what
> you want.
>
> In case you have not looked at it, there are quite a lot to learn in the
> tutorial, for a begineer.
>
> Le auguro un buon lavoro.
> Cordiali Saluti
> JM

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Why choose SolidWorks 3D CAD for Mechanical product design & drawings?
Next: Feldman