Prev: Urgent Openings: 1.GIS Web Developer, 2.Business System Analyst, Austin, TX.
Next: Security prompt Java 6 Update 20
From: Lew on 29 Jun 2010 14:49
rossum wrote:
> How about J#?  I know it is obsolete, but it is a way to get Java
> source code into the Microsoft world.
>

J# will handle some Java source code, but not all. A quick web search
seems to indicate that J# doesn't support anything more recent than
Java 1.1.4 with a little bit of 1.2 collections. I found no evidence
of support for anything more recent. That's "obsolete" like the BP
oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico is a "leak".

Another consideration is that J# makes no promises to support most
standard Java API calls, with which most existing Java code abounds.

Another consideration is that it is not available in recent versions
of Microsoft's development suites.

So good luck with that one.

--
Lew
From: Mac on 29 Jun 2010 18:58
Thanks all. Arne, it appears that at least the rgagnon.com option
suffers from similar limitations as J#. The packager referenced
appears to only be a part of JDK 1.2, which I'm assuming translates to
a lack of support for anything more recent. Haven't yet examined the
other option, but the expense makes that a tough one to swallow. Will
probably give it a go though, just to see if the functionality is
really there.

Will continue to hunt and see if I can't come up with anything.
Thanks for the help!

On Jun 28, 7:18 pm, Arne Vajhøj <a...(a)vajhoej.dk> wrote:
> On 28-06-2010 21:15, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>
> > On 28-06-2010 20:52, Mac wrote:
> >> Am afraid I already know the answer to this, but...: am interested in
> >> compiling a set of java classes into .dll form to be later accessed
> >> from MS' VBA. I realize this is likely making life much harder than
> >> it needs to, but my deployment options are extremely limited, and
> >> having an "externally" running application outside the IT-approved
> >> norm (vs something "trusted"/"internal" like Excel) is currently a no-
> >> go.
>
> >> Is there any way to bridge the gap and allow this accessibility?
>
> > 10-12 years ago several product existed that could expose
> > a Java bean as a COM object.
>
> > If you can still find one of those then you can use it.
>
> http://www.rgagnon.com/javadetails/java-0045.htmlhttp://www.nevaobject.com/j2cdetails.asp
> etc.
>
> Arne

From: Jeff Higgins on 29 Jun 2010 19:16
On 6/29/2010 6:58 PM, Mac wrote:
> Thanks all. Arne, it appears that at least the rgagnon.com option
> suffers from similar limitations as J#. The packager referenced
> appears to only be a part of JDK 1.2, which I'm assuming translates to
> a lack of support for anything more recent. Haven't yet examined the
> other option, but the expense makes that a tough one to swallow. Will
> probably give it a go though, just to see if the functionality is
> really there.
>
> Will continue to hunt and see if I can't come up with anything.
> Thanks for the help!

Thank you for inspiring me to look about my Java SDK distribution.
Have you run across these pages?
<http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/desktop/javabeans/index.jsp>
<http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/desktop/javabeans/activex_tools.jsp>
<http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/beans/axbridge/developerguide/index.html>

>
> On Jun 28, 7:18 pm, Arne Vajh�j<a...(a)vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>> On 28-06-2010 21:15, Arne Vajh�j wrote:
>>
>>> On 28-06-2010 20:52, Mac wrote:
>>>> Am afraid I already know the answer to this, but...: am interested in
>>>> compiling a set of java classes into .dll form to be later accessed
>>>> from MS' VBA. I realize this is likely making life much harder than
>>>> it needs to, but my deployment options are extremely limited, and
>>>> having an "externally" running application outside the IT-approved
>>>> norm (vs something "trusted"/"internal" like Excel) is currently a no-
>>>> go.
>>
>>>> Is there any way to bridge the gap and allow this accessibility?
>>
>>> 10-12 years ago several product existed that could expose
>>> a Java bean as a COM object.
>>
>>> If you can still find one of those then you can use it.
>>
>> http://www.rgagnon.com/javadetails/java-0045.htmlhttp://www.nevaobject.com/j2cdetails.asp
>> etc.
>>
>> Arne
>

From: Mac on 29 Jun 2010 23:47
Jeff-

Was actually just logging on to claim victory. Came across a mention
of the ActiveX Bridge out there somewher and gave it a shot...setup
was kind of a pain, but end result rocks. Once the packager chews
through your compiled .jar and spits out a dll, its a matter of
seconds to get it registered. From there, all your methods are
readily available from VBA. Admittedly, have only tossed a simple
class with a few very basic number crunching methods at it, but so far
so good.

Appreciate the below, and again everyone else's help.

Cheers!

Mac

On Jun 29, 5:16 pm, Jeff Higgins <oohigg...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 6/29/2010 6:58 PM, Mac wrote:
>
> > Thanks all.  Arne, it appears that at least the rgagnon.com option
> > suffers from similar limitations as J#.  The packager referenced
> > appears to only be a part of JDK 1.2, which I'm assuming translates to
> > a lack of support for anything more recent.  Haven't yet examined the
> > other option, but the expense makes that a tough one to swallow.  Will
> > probably give it a go though, just to see if the functionality is
> > really there.
>
> > Will continue to hunt and see if I can't come up with anything.
> > Thanks for the help!
>
> Thank you for inspiring me to look about my Java SDK distribution.
> Have you run across these pages?
> <http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/desktop/javabeans/index.jsp>
> <http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/desktop/javabeans/activex_too...>
> <http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/beans/axbridge/developergui...>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 28, 7:18 pm, Arne Vajhøj<a...(a)vajhoej.dk>  wrote:
> >> On 28-06-2010 21:15, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>
> >>> On 28-06-2010 20:52, Mac wrote:
> >>>> Am afraid I already know the answer to this, but...: am interested in
> >>>> compiling a set of java classes into .dll form to be later accessed
> >>>> from MS' VBA. I realize this is likely making life much harder than
> >>>> it needs to, but my deployment options are extremely limited, and
> >>>> having an "externally" running application outside the IT-approved
> >>>> norm (vs something "trusted"/"internal" like Excel) is currently a no-
> >>>> go.
>
> >>>> Is there any way to bridge the gap and allow this accessibility?
>
> >>> 10-12 years ago several product existed that could expose
> >>> a Java bean as a COM object.
>
> >>> If you can still find one of those then you can use it.
>
> >>http://www.rgagnon.com/javadetails/java-0045.htmlhttp://www.nevaobjec....
> >> etc.
>
> >> Arne- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

From: Jeff Higgins on 30 Jun 2010 12:41
On 6/29/2010 11:47 PM, Mac wrote:
> Jeff-
>
> Was actually just logging on to claim victory. Came across a mention
> of the ActiveX Bridge out there somewher and gave it a shot...setup
> was kind of a pain, but end result rocks. Once the packager chews
> through your compiled .jar and spits out a dll, its a matter of
> seconds to get it registered. From there, all your methods are
> readily available from VBA. Admittedly, have only tossed a simple
> class with a few very basic number crunching methods at it, but so far
> so good.
>
Great! Thanks for sharing. That'll give me another something to play
with on a future dreary day.
Something else I was unaware of that I discovered while poking around my
JDK bin directory was VisualVM, documented starting here:
<http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/visualvm/index.html>
Altogether a good day, thanks again.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Urgent Openings: 1.GIS Web Developer, 2.Business System Analyst, Austin, TX.
Next: Security prompt Java 6 Update 20