Prev:  “Dark Flow” isn't “statistically significant”.
Next: Stardust in the Solar Wind
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 21 Apr 2010 02:09
Blueshift is not an easy topic to find out information.

Anyway, let me summarize the types of redshift commonly bantered
about. There
are three such types:
(a) Doppler redshift -- relative motion or speeding away of two
objects, causing
an elongation of the wavelength
(b) Cosmological redshift-- due to expansion of Space itself from a
Big Bang
(c) Gravitational redshift-- pull of a gravitational field.

We can leave out gravitational redshift. The Atom Totality theory
would argue
that since speeds of all galaxies are so tiny of speeds that we would
not
see any redshift cosmic wide. And the Atom Totality would argue that
the
Cosmological redshift is not due to a explosion, because Space is not
moving or expanding but rather standing still, and the Cosmic redshift
is due to light traveling through a highly curved Space.

So the Atom Totality theory would say on the issue of Cosmic redshift,
that
we can exlude Doppler redshift since the speeds of galaxies are so
small of
speeds that they have little to no contribution.

And as the experiment of a fiberglass window with oncoming headlights
of autos
shows that the redshift is all about refraction of Space.

Redshift as the curvature of Space is what the Atom Totality
prescribes, and it
is a relationship dependent on distance, similar to the Hubble law,
only the cause
is not an expansion but a geometry effect.

So, the question is, can the blueshift tell whether the Big Bang is
true or false?
And can the blueshift tell of the Atom Totality is true or false?

I think it can.

There should be alot more blueshifts occurring if the Big Bang is
true. In fact,
blueshifts are rare.

This indicates that the curvature of space causing redshifts goes into
action at a
relatively small distance away from Earth. Beyond the Andromeda galaxy
there
is hardly any blueshift seen. What blueshift occurrs is rotational
speeds and this
is a very tiny blueshift.

I think the data supports the Atom Totality. Because if blueshifts
disappear at relatively
small distance from Earth, indicates that the geometry of Space is the
cause, not
the motion or expansion of Space.

The Big Bang would predict a large number of cases of blueshift for
distant galaxies.
The Atom Totality would predict no cases of blueshift for distant
galaxies. As far as
I can see in the reports, there are no blueshifts, unless you want to
call the rotational
motion as blueshifts.

In a debate of the Big Bang versus Atom Totality over redshift and
blueshift, I want to
draw attention on a weakness of the Big Bang theory that is
exploitative. The Big Bang
says there are no edges to the Cosmos and there is no center of the
Cosmos. So they
are saying that the Big Bang is 2D Elliptic geometry as a sphere
surface to account for
an explosion and that this explosion gives a redshift since all
galaxies are moving away
from one another. But they are in trouble with that notion because we
know that Space is 3 dimensional.

The Atom Totality understands that space is 3 dimensional and tries to
show a 3rd
dimension to the surface of a sphere. It is this 3rd dimension that
light from distant
galaxies has to travel through and is thus refracted and redshifted.
This 3rd dimension
is sort of like a ** lens** and as white light travels through that
lens, it is redshifted.

So where the Big Bang explains redshift as a 2D explosion for a sphere
surface, the
Atom Totality explains the redshift as the 3rd Dimension of the sphere
surface with a
lens as the third that causes the redshift.

So the Big Bang people have been derelict in not coming up with the
3rd dimension
of Space. I do not think they want everyone to believe that the Cosmos
is only
two dimensional, just so their theory can pass.

Through the years someone should have composed a compendium of all the
blueshifts,
for I believe such a focused study on just blueshifts alone can decide
whether the
Big Bang theory is a fake or has a fighting chance.

Since blueshifts are rare and only local. Discounting all the
blueshifts due to rotations.
We can almost announce the end of the Big Bang theory.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev:  “Dark Flow” isn't “statistically significant”.
Next: Stardust in the Solar Wind