From: ati on 27 Mar 2010 13:57 Hi, I'd like to evaluate double improper intagral, like: >>F=@(t,x)exp(-x.*t)./t.^3; >>dblquad(F,1,inf,0,inf)); results: Warning: Infinite or Not-a-Number function value encountered. ans= NaN and >> int(int(F,t,1,inf),x,0,inf); results: ??? Undefined function or variable 't'. Help is much appreciated.
From: Roger Stafford on 27 Mar 2010 16:10 "ati " <nati02(a)t-online.hu> wrote in message <holgpt$3fk$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > Hi, > I'd like to evaluate double improper intagral, like: > >>F=@(t,x)exp(-x.*t)./t.^3; > > >>dblquad(F,1,inf,0,inf)); > results: Warning: Infinite or Not-a-Number function value encountered. ans= NaN > > and > >> int(int(F,t,1,inf),x,0,inf); > results: ??? Undefined function or variable 't'. > > Help is much appreciated. You can try a change of variables that makes both limits finite to see if that helps. For example, try u = 1/t and y = 1/(x+1). That brings both u and y into the finite range from 0 to 1, which would avoid that first warning you received. Unfortunately the transformed integrand becomes u/y^2*exp((y-1)/(u*y)) and you might receive a different warning if 'dblquad' evaluates this for values of u and y that are too close to zero. If that happens, you could fudge the two limits up just a very small amount away from zero to avoid such computational difficulties. The integrand values would actually be exceedingly small for such values of u and y in spite of the division by y^2. As for attempting to find a symbolic integral with 'int', my (admittedly rather ancient) integral table lists only a power series for that particular integral, so I suspect that you would receive a matlab message to the effect that there was "no explicit solution found". Roger Stafford
From: Walter Roberson on 27 Mar 2010 18:22 ati wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to evaluate double improper intagral, like: >>> F=@(t,x)exp(-x.*t)./t.^3; > >>> dblquad(F,1,inf,0,inf)); > results: Warning: Infinite or Not-a-Number function value encountered. > ans= NaN > > and >>> int(int(F,t,1,inf),x,0,inf); > results: ??? Undefined function or variable 't'. If you reverse the order of integration, then a symbolic package (Maple) quickly gives an answer of 1/3 for the double integration. On the other hand, the inner integration is then expressed in terms of a limit, so I do not have an intuitive understanding of what that really means or whether the simple final answer is really correct. I am attempting some numeric verification.... yes, Maple's int() function with the numeric option confirms the 1/3.
From: Roger Stafford on 27 Mar 2010 19:42 Walter Roberson <roberson(a)hushmail.com> wrote in message <hom0fg$7oc$1(a)canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca>... > If you reverse the order of integration, then a symbolic package (Maple) > quickly gives an answer of 1/3 for the double integration. On the other > hand, the inner integration is then expressed in terms of a limit, so I > do not have an intuitive understanding of what that really means or > whether the simple final answer is really correct. I am attempting some > numeric verification.... yes, Maple's int() function with the numeric > option confirms the 1/3. Yes, you're right, Walter. The answer is indeed 1/3. In fact it can easily be done by hand that way. I just didn't think to try reversing the order. Roger Stafford
From: ati on 28 Mar 2010 16:53 "ati " <nati02(a)t-online.hu> wrote in message <holgpt$3fk$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > Hi, > I'd like to evaluate double improper intagral, like: > >>F=@(t,x)exp(-x.*t)./t.^3; > > >>dblquad(F,1,inf,0,inf)); > results: Warning: Infinite or Not-a-Number function value encountered. ans= NaN > > and > >> int(int(F,t,1,inf),x,0,inf); > results: ??? Undefined function or variable 't'. > > Help is much appreciated. Thanx for your replies. Actually, I am coding the NORTA method for gamma random variables with linear correlations. In the initialization step a double intagral must be evaluated (several times) with the standard bivariate normal distribution as the integrator to find implied correlations. The posted example was only to clearify my problem. Now I use a reasonable finite domain, and so far seems to work well.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: double infinite integral Next: Vertical x-tick labels on bar charts |